Generation Draft - COMPLETED!!

Yeah, go ahead Shravi :thumbs

And thank God someone finally picked Murali! He was one of the two I was thinking of. The greatest bowler of all-time in my opinion. Can't believe he got selected so late.

Flower's an interesting pick. Wasn't expecting him to be picked. And I'm going need to re-organize my strategy here. There was a certain player I was targeting this round, because I thought the obvious greats would have already been picked. But I guess not.
 
My pick is Adam Gilchrist. Will do a write up later.
 
Last edited:
24.jpg

Wasim Akram

Can't believe I managed to get this guy. I was originally planning on picking someone else, but you don't let the opportunity of grabbing The Sultan of Swing go.

Most of you know about this guy already, but Akram for me has to be the most talented bowler to have graced the game. He had it all - pace, in-swing, out-swing, reverse swing, yorker, bouncer, slower ball....you name it, he could do it. All from a short run-up. As a tribute to his abilities, he's only one of 3 bowlers to take more than one Test-Hatrick.

He could even swing the ball both ways in one delivery! Just check out this delivery to Croft (uploaded by our very own Robelinda):


Was no mug with the bat either. While he did under-achieve in this aspect, he did have the potential to change matches. The best example of this is probably his first series in Australia, when he made his maiden ton after Pak were 90/5. He even has a score of 257* to his name, albeit against pathetic Zim attack.

For being arguably the greatest left-arm bowler to play the game, Wasim Akram makes my XI with final stats of:

Matches: 104
Runs: 2898
Average: 22.64

Wickets: 414
Average: 23.62

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

wally-hammond-in-command.jpg

Wally Hammond

Wally Hammond. What a legend! He broke almost every world record of batting at the time. 3rd fastest to 6000 runs after Sobers and Bradman, and fastest to reach 7000. Has a triple century under his name, and averaged close to 60. Yet, his finest innings was just 32 runs. On a sticky wicket which was deemed unplayable, with 13 wickets falling for under 100 runs, Hammond made his stand.

He could bowl as well. While primarily a medium pacer, many observers comment he could bowl fast if he wanted to. Many considered if he wasn't so focused on his batting, he could open the bowling for England. And they're not kidding - he managed to dismiss The Don 3 times!! Not a bad man at the slips either. At at a time when fielding wasn't considered that important, Hammond managed over a 100 catches at slips.

Of being arguably the greatest batsman England has ever produced, Wally Hammond makes my XI with final stats of:

Matches: 85
Runs: 7249
Average: 58.45

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JoeDarling.jpg

Joe Darling

Just look at that moustache! Fear ye mortals!

One of the most brilliant captains of his time, Darling won of 7 of his 21 Tests as captain, and lost only 4. He opened the innings for less than half of his career, yet managed to score more than half of his runs in that position, at a much higher average. All of his 3 Test centuries also came in that position.

The only downside is that his moustache was the only thing worth looking at. He wasn't a stroke-player, and defended the ball with a passion. Might not have been pretty, but he certainly was reliable. And that's not a bad quality in an opener. You need someone to bore and tire the new-ball bowlers out. And besides, Hammond and Weekes more than make up for his snooze-fest.

For being a resolute opener, and as Wisden put it, "one of the very best captains that ever took a team into the field", Joe Darling makes my XI with final stats of:

Matches: 34
Runs: 1657
Average: 28.56

(Note: His average would have been higher if he opened a lot more).

The Papa XI:
1)
2) J Darling (*)
3) W Hammond
4) E Weekes
5)
6)
7)
8) W Rhodes
9) W Akram
10) D Lillee
11) C Turner

Nice. Very nice. Terror and Lillee to wreck havoc with the new ball, and Wasim to shatter stumps with the old. And just look at the middle order pair - Hammond and Weekes.

Think I just had an orgasam.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Papa and others, just letting you know I won't be on for the next day or 2 so will most likely miss my pick this round. So when it's my turn just skip me and I'll take the last pick (unless I'm back earlier of course). Should be fine for the next round though, unless there is a slew of quick picks, so I'll just make all my picks then.

Since Shravi is online now, I guess he'll make his new picks as well. Which means I had to bump you down to No.6 for this round. To make it up, I bumped you up to No. 5 for round 5 :thumbs And you've still got No. 2 for Round 6.

If COB had not picked up Warne very first up in this round, it would have been my pick. :) That's because there are quite a few pacers to chose from in this round and in the coming rounds but getting a great spinner in your side is a little harder when compared to getting great pacers.

Did you forget about Murali - the greatest bowler in Test history?

Are you talking about deadly duo of the 90's who used to give all the batsman constant nightmares :p

Nah. Was talking about Gilly and Murali.
 
I wanted Warne, I love leg spinners. :p
 
Benaud's still available I believe :thumbs

Nevermind, AngryPixel has Benaud.
 
Last edited:
Can you extend my pick time to 24 hours? I will make it in that time. I can't do it now.
 
My picks are Stanley Jackson and Sir Leonard Hutton. Write ups to follow.
 
ooooooh, well, I'm not picking him. I dunno, I went for sobers and hobbs, I'll just seem like a dick. anyway, iwant someone else. my 1927-1950 pick is George Headley, see what I've done, sobers, headley, murali, all these dudes carried teams on their own. This has not got a hope of working in a real life team work scenario. but yeah, headley is cooler than the man that gave him the nickname the black b******, ok that looks very wrong. He is also going to be the only panamanian selected in any all-time XI.

I suppose there's something to be said about the 60 plus average, and his FC stats which hint it might have been better had the war not cut short his test career but look at him! like a some dandy blues musician, he's magnificent.

230px-Headley_photo.jpg


And because one good george deserves another, my second pick is George Giffen. Chuffed to bits getting him, it was either him or Tom Richardson in round 1 so in the end the dilema has worked itself out. Australian hall of famer, and get this, was the first person EVER, to take 10 wickets in a match and make over a 100 runs. from thence on, all all-rounders looked to this chap (probably, I don't really know)

just finishing work so no time to look for a picture but obviously it's just going to be a sepia tinted pic of a guy with a moustache anyway.
 
Last edited:
85837.jpg


What can I say about Adam Gilchrist that hasn't already been said? As a kid growing up in the age of Adam Gilchrist, I have seen very few players who have shaped the game as he has. He has truly redefined the role of the wicketkeeper in modern-day cricket. No longer is the writing on the wall with 6 wickets down and very few runs on the board. Gilchrist was often Australia's lifeline and he responded to that pressure quite brilliantly. He could turn the match on its head in a matter of hours and place the pressure back on the opposition.

I also think as some Australians on PC have pointed out, there is a bit of a false aura about Healy being a much much better keeper simply because his batting wasn't as good as Gilchrist's. People wanted to go that extra mile to justify his credentials. Gilly's keeping skills may have slightly deteriorated towards the end of the career, but that was only age taking its toll. He was a fantastic keeper throughout his career and certainly had a very safe pair of hands. Adam Gilchrist was truly a pioneer of the game and his legend will forever be etched in the annals of cricketing history.

In 96 tests (137 innings), he scored 5570 runs at an average of 48 with a highest score of 204 vs South Africa. This includes 17 centuries and 26 fifties. As a wicket-keeper, he took 379 catches and made 37 stumpings.

12937.jpg


Sir Leonard Hutton was one of the greatest players ever. Following WW2, there was very little dispute regarding who was the greatest batsman. He was a defensive batsman by nature but could accelerate when needed. Although his technique is described as "orthodox and conventional", he could cope quite formidably with the minefields of his time (and there were quite a few). It is with this orthodox technique that he set the then record for the highest score in a single innings with 364 against Australia. In 79 tests, he scored a mammoth 6971 runs at an average of 57 with 19 centuries and 33 fifties.

104075.jpg


I am quite surprised nobody picked Stanley Jackson already as he has quite a record. His all round success makes him a rather easy pick for me at this stage. He is said to have had "fine judgment, perseverance, and, above all, exceptional courage". He was a stylish artist and played a free flowing game. He could drive equally proficiently on both sides and is described as "perhaps the finest forcing on-side batsman of his time". His average may not have been as high as Hutton's but he played on far more sticky wickets which makes his record all the more enviable. He was also a cunning bowler. It doesn't seem as though he bowled at great pace but he could deceive batsmen with his sharp movement and accuracy. In 22 tests (33 innings as a batsman), he scored 1415 runs at an average of 49 with 5 centuries and 6 fifties. In 27 innings as a bowler he took 24 wickets at an average of 33 with 1 four-for and 1 five-for.

Sir Leonard Hutton (6971 runs @ 57)
2
3
4
Stanley Jackson (1415 runs @ 49, 24 wickets @ 33)
Adam Gilchrist (5570 runs @ 48, 379 catches, 37 stumpings)
Aubrey Faulkner (1754 runs @ 41, 82 wickets @ 26.58)
Johnny Briggs (815 runs @ 18.11, 118 wickets @ 17.15)
Malcolm Marshall (1810 runs @ 18.85, 376 wickets @ 20.94)
Fred Trueman (307 wickets @ 21.57)
11
 
Last edited:
^Indeed - those 'taches really killed it back then :p Yeah Giffen seems to be a bit of a 19th century favourite with the historians, but his record was kinda not as good as I thought it would be. But honestly, who cares hey? WGs Test record isn't awesome either and he was the greatest player of the day.

Sifter, you can just PM me a list of 3 guys you want. The two guys you want most, and the guy you want if those other two are taken by the two people in front of you. If User's pick is not pushed to the end of the round (as I think it is) and he just gets to make his pick whenever he comes on then send me a list of 4 guys in order of preference. I'll make your pick for you.

Had a very rough list in my head, but 4 guys was a little too many to list I thought. As it turns out the guys I probably would have sent to you would have been Murali, Ponting, Gilchrist - one of those is still left :thumbs So it's all worked out, now I'm just gotta work out whether I actually want Punter or if I need to take a bowler instead. So I'm glad I've had the time to think about it rather than a rushed choice.

Since Shravi is online now, I guess he'll make his new picks as well. Which means I had to bump you down to No.6 for this round. To make it up, I bumped you up to No. 5 for round 5 :thumbs And you've still got No. 2 for Round 6.

I appreciate your efforts for fair play :thumbs

Andy Flower is an interesting pick tbh.
Was expecting Anthony McGrath to be gone by now as well.

Yeah I think Flower's a great pick. Quality batsman with a 2nd string to his bow. We think Jacques Kallis is a great all-rounder, why not Flower? Must have been my pick of Flower in the last 90s and onwards draft that convinced you huh User? :p

----------

And I was thinking Stanley Jackson shravi, but for the 1900 round - I didn't realise he started earlier...:( Also, agree very much on Gilly's keeping. I think he was always one of the best keepers in world cricket, if not the best.
 
My picks are Billy Bates and Denis Compton.
Sorry for no writing since I am too busy with my exams but will do as soon as I get some time.

My Team:
1.
2.
3.Kumar Sangakkara - Runs: 9167 - Average: 56.93 - Dismissals: 187
4.Graeme Pollock - Runs: 2256 - Average: 60.97
5.Denis Compton - Runs: 5809 - Average: 50
6.
7.
8.Billy Bates - Runs: 656 - Average: 27.33 - Wickets: 50 - Average: 16.42
9.Sydney Barnes - Wickets: 189 - Average: 16.43
10.Joel Garner - Wickets: 259 - Average: 20.97
11.John Ferris - Wickets: 61 - Average: 12.70

so far overall results,

Total runs: 17232 - Average: 53
Total Wickets: 559 - Average: 16.6
 
Last edited:
Hammond has gone already I'm afraid

----------

Billy Bates is cool though, was having a look at his page the other day :thumbs

----------

Also Aoun, are you going to use Sanga as your keeper? Or have you not yet decided.
 
Hammond is replaced with Compton.
Not sure yet about Sanga....
 
Oohh Compton, I like That's a great middle order you've got there. :clap

So Angry Pixel has the floor...

Are you talking about deadly duo of the 90's who used to give all the batsman constant nightmares :p

Gosh which ones? Wasim/Waqar of course, but there was Ambrose/Walsh, Donald/Pollock/Ntini, McGrath/Gillespie. We had a thread about this not so long ago I think. I like Ambrose/Walsh, thought they were really relentless.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top