- Joined
- Jan 31, 2006
- Location
- India
- Profile Flag
- India
- Online Cricket Games Owned
- Don Bradman Cricket 14 - PS3
Once the BCCI starts flexing its muscles, you'll all know who's boss. If you guys don't like it, lump it.
Anyone else find it funny that all the Indians aren't mentioning Hogg's case, where all the evidence against him was used EXACTLY like it was against Harbhajan? [/COLOR]
Care to show us some examples of the mean ICC being anti India?
Fair enough mate good point. However the reason Hogg only got a reprimand was because he insulted an Indian player, whilst Harbhajan's 'monkey' comment is considered racist. Racist is worse than a sheer insult in out society today bud.In your country calling somebody a ******* might be acceptable to us that's a deadly insult.
So the same rules should apply. Hogg should be banned for the same duration as Bhajji has been.
In our country calling somebody a monkey is not racist at all.
So there you go, Mr. Double Standards. Why is Hogg merely reprimanded while Harbhajan has been banned?
We have a reason to believe that the Australians have come toegtehr and falsesly accussed Harbhajan.It is possible.
Once the BCCI starts flexing its muscles, you'll all know who's boss. If you guys don't like it, lump it.
Absolutely right.We have a reason to believe that the Australians have come toegtehr and falsesly accussed Harbhajan.It is possible.
Because you Aussies cannot seem to get your heads out of cricket and look at the politics behind it all.
WE've been affected too much by the ICC's biased attitude.
Because this is Cricket. Did India even think about what might happen if they withdraw from the tests? Did they actually seem like they give a care to the game of Cricket? Do India care about anything but being so selfish but to drag the whole game of Cricket to revolve around them and all their problems?
Care to show us some examples of the mean ICC being anti India?
Guys I think there has been a misconception of the outcome of the trial. This is the report about what happened.
Harbhajan Singh, 3 games suspension.
He hit Brett Lee on the bottom with his bat as Brett Lee was walking back to his mark to bowl, in a playful gesture. Andrew Symonds saw this and said to Harbhajan "What's that for mate?" Harbhajan then called Symonds over during the break in the over (This is the bit that we all saw) and called him a monkey, again after the big outrage in India. Matthew Hayden heard that and said "Guys, stop it" He then walked away and Harbhajan said something to him (thats when we all saw Hayden put his hand up in the air, making a gesture to the indians like 'settle down)..
Brag Hogg, Repremand.
Calling an Indian player a bast**d. Now, guys this is the important bit that should stop all your comments about Harbhajan being treated without evidence. The testimony against Brad Hogg was based of Indian players who are going off the same thing as Harbhajan's case, here say.
So. If you want Harbhajan's ban appealed because all the evidence was just 'here say' fair enough I guess, but while you are at it, Brad Hogg should also get his reprimand taken off him because all the evidence was just 'here say' against him.
Anyone else find it funny that all the Indians aren't mentioning Hogg's case, where all the evidence against him was used EXACTLY like it was against Harbhajan?
We have a reason to believe that the Australians have come toegtehr and falsesly accussed Harbhajan.It is possible.
Fair enough mate good point. However the reason Hogg only got a reprimand was because he insulted an Indian player, whilst Harbhajan's 'monkey' comment is considered racist. Racist is worse than a sheer insult in out society today bud.
And you make a good point in saying "Monkey isn't a racist word in India" well, it isn't a racist word in Australia either. It is offensive to people of Carribean decent, infact a few West Indians on here said that they would take 'monkey' as a racist term, so we should realise that.
Fair enough mate good point. However the reason Hogg only got a reprimand was because he insulted an Indian player, whilst Harbhajan's 'monkey' comment is considered racist. Racist is worse than a sheer insult in out society today bud.
And you make a good point in saying "Monkey isn't a racist word in India" well, it isn't a racist word in Australia either. It is offensive to people of Carribean decent, infact a few West Indians on here said that they would take 'monkey' as a racist term, so we should realise that.
Once the BCCI starts flexing its muscles, you'll all know who's boss. If you guys don't like it, lump it.
Absolutely right.
The whole Australian team almost has given evidence against Harbhajan when not even one or two of them could have heard what he said to Symonds.
It's blatantly ridiculous.