StinkyBoHoon
National Board President
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2009
- Location
- Glasgow, Scotland
Sorry I just don't agree personally. I think when you've got a system there that can benefit decisions in such a way with a huge minority of incorrect readings it should be used to the largest extent possible. That's my thoughts though.
To be fair on the bounce one he was pretty far down the track and having seen the side on view I thought it would be quite high on the stumps (on the bails) although that far over does seem a little surprising.
I'm sympathetic to india's suspicion of DRS, for one they don't really seem to benefit from opposing it, they get as many stinkers as anyone. also I think, given that one of the problems of DRS is at heart it depends on how good your players are at knowing when to challenge and if india don't think their players are very good at knowing how to use it why not oppose it? we have umpires because they do a seperate job in a cricket match, predicting the bounce of an LBW is not really what cricketers should need to do.
where I think their stance against it is a problem is that with widespread use of it by every other nation it becomes an issue of them refusing to submit to a clear democratic mandate and I think people can legitimately ask whether sri lanka or the west indies or new zealand would get away with being the only test nation that refuses to adopt it and what that says about the way India use their power in the game.