If he had three years on his contract ?15 M would be awful. That makes it worse.
lol. If he had three years left in contract, I wouldn't have thought twice about splashing out ?15M, quite simply because it's blatantly obvious he's very talented.
Did say ?15M was a lot of money for a guy who was in his final year of contract at PSG though..
As Auwais said, he's still very raw but seriously has the tools in him to go distances. Time is on his side too.
A player bought for that fee was never going to be on the bench because that's just silly, he was always going to start.
Allen's on the bench right now. Bought for the same price.
Lamela's on the bench right now for Spurs. Bought for double the price of Sakho and also for Spurs' club record transfer fee.
Agger is a fine defender but I'd argue that Skrtel relegated him to the bench and not Sakho
Agger has never played on the right of a CB pairing, and Skrtel has never played on the left of a CB pairing. So this reasoning is just wrong.
Take nothing away from Skrtel though, he's been quite outstanding this season, and each and every other point you mentioned about Skrtel in your previous post was spot on. Has nothing to do with relegating Agger to the bench though.
Thing is, Sakho has started bloody brilliantly here at Anfield, and has thus deservedly cemented his place as first choice LCB over Agger. Nothing more, nothing less.
Anyway, I believe we've agreed to disagree on Sakho, so let's move on..
Last edited: