War
Chairman of Selectors
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2010
- Online Cricket Games Owned
For once I won't blame the selectors for that. I'm sure it was in writing that they had to name their Ashes squad today direct from CA. So they are the ones to blame for this whole mess.
Yea now reading the article is the CA was pushing for them to name some sort of squad early. So yea for once they get a pass.
I'd like to know the reason why Hughes has been dropped. I know he hasn't had the best season starting from English cricket to Shield but I didn't think that was enough for him to be dropped.
Yea, but of course dont bring that logic to the selectors. Although again i may cut them some slack for not picking Hughes (although i dont agree), given that means they see Katich/Watson as the main opening slot & they are reluctant to toggle with that ATM. Given thats basically the only stable runs that has been coming from AUS in the last 18 months of inconsistent batting.
But JESUS...did you hear Hilditch again on Hughes: The Ashes 2010-11: Xavier Doherty's chance to go all the way | Cricket News | The Ashes 2010-11 | ESPN Cricinfo
quote said:Andrew Hilditch, the chairman of selectors, said Phillip Hughes was disappointed to miss out, but the team did not need cover for the openers Simon Katich and Shane Watson. "We would consider him in a middle-order position," Hilditch said, "but at the moment we think the two young players from Australia A we picked are in a bit better form and ready to go."
Everytime one these folks explain some of the selection they make. They just expose how out of depth they are & why as we all say, a new selection panel is needed.