angryangy
ICC Chairman
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2004
The difference for me was stepping to leg and pulling off that stunning cover drive. He trusted in the full depth of his skills, rather than blocking every marginally good ball like he doesn't have any shots. I do think that when batting at number 3, he tends to think he has to protect the innings a bit, whereas opening donates a clean slate of responsibility.
The reality is, of course, that an innings of T20 can't be saved by scoring no runs. A safe shot is the one that is the most profitable. A batsman doesn't punish the bad ball so much as reward only the finest deliveries with an honest defence.
15-20 balls is definitely not too short an innings. He could have won the first game with that. The nature of Twenty20 is to ride your luck (which is not to say that Tests are not a game of chance). Against bad bowling, he might have made 50 in the same time.
The reality is, of course, that an innings of T20 can't be saved by scoring no runs. A safe shot is the one that is the most profitable. A batsman doesn't punish the bad ball so much as reward only the finest deliveries with an honest defence.
15-20 balls is definitely not too short an innings. He could have won the first game with that. The nature of Twenty20 is to ride your luck (which is not to say that Tests are not a game of chance). Against bad bowling, he might have made 50 in the same time.