You implied that Anderson is injured because England are playing too much cricket whilst not rotating their players while in actuality he hasn't got injured until he's had a long break.
So every time he has a long break he gets injured?!?!?!
I am talking about his
career, not just his latest injury.
----------
To not recognise the lacking wickets from the last Test might prove foolhardy, while we might be 1-0 up there is a chance we could draw 1-1 if we don't get our batting and bowling right.
I'd bring in Onions, not too convinced by Finn but then he's been picked now so I'd give him the next game at least
Strauss : 2605 runs @ 44.15
Cook : 3334 runs @ 53.77
Trott : 1850 runs @ 63.79
Bell : 1859 runs @ 50.24
Pietersen : 2460 runs @ 45.56
Morgan : 347 runs @ 34.70
Prior : 1716 runs @ 45.16
Swann : 137 wkts @ 27.82
Tremlett : 8 wkts @ 29.63
Onions : 28 wkts @ 31.04
Finn : 50 wkts @ 26.92
Averages are 2008 onwards. Prior is scoring enough runs that we don't need Broad's 'extra batting', however we could do with extra wicket taking potency and so Onions' wickets at 31.04 and an SR of 51.04 are more use than Broad's at 35.75 and an SR of 67.32 - not forgetting Broad doesn't even bat 1/3 of the time and accounting for him averaging 39.88 with the ball against top sides in that period (and 40.98 overall against top sides)
That said of course, Anderson averages 27.22 in the same period BUT 33.84 against top sides and 20.32 against New Zealand, West Indies, Bangladesh and Pakistan which drags his average right down