Wow this really makes sense:
If ABD scores fastest hundred, best batting ever; if Rohit hits double hundred, worst bowling ever.
Out of the 3 ODI double hundreds that Rohit has scored, two of them have been against Sri Lanka. SL have in recent times, been many teams' favorite punching bag. I rate his double hundred against Australia (in 2013, Bangalore) as his best innings purely because it came against.... Australia!
I still dont think Rohit Sharma is the ideal guy to open the innings in ODI's. Especially when we tour abroad. Because when conditions are tough, he eats up balls and eventually he is going to get a ball with his name on it. And by that time, the momentum of the innings is sucked up totally and India are in trouble from which they cannot get out of. But the problem is, his double hundreds unfortunately come in the way of moving him down the order.
I think he means to say that we still should not say that it was just bad bowling which was the reason Rohit made the 200. Cause many are undervaluing him.What? Who said this? And where does AB feature in all of this?
If you're trying to compare the two as batsman my friend, you are absolutely dreaming.