^What about Shoiab Akhtar or Shane Warne? Cheaters? There's a SA player who might get picked here who fits that category too, I though mohit might have gone for him actually.
As for Bond vs Akhtar, yeah you really didn't have much choice. Bond is the best strike bowler NZ has had recently, even if his career was brief. Luckily I liked Vettori to play the support role for Warne I agree about NZ missing Bond though, I mentioned it in my Vettori write up that he averaged almost 10 less when Bond played. Bond helped that team a lot.
BTW, did you like my little dig I had at Sehwag in the Gambhir summary I wrote
Well AB opened for SA for quite a few Tests. He's been much better in the middle though. Or Dravid could open I guess to give you another option.
And just to tidy up...
Graeme Smith
I reckon Graeme Smith is one of world cricket's most underrated batsmen, and together with Gambhir, they must be 2 of the most underappreciated players going around. Smith has often had to open the batting on lively South African pitches and he averages only a smidge under 50 over an impressive career. Only Jacques Kallis has scored more runs for South Africa.
Interesting fact: Smith has never scored a 100 in a losing cause. Of his 22 100s, 15 have been in SA wins, and 7 in draws. So when Smith does well, South Africa does well.
Debut: vs Australia, Cape Town, 2002
Tests: 91
Runs: 7457
Average: 49.71
HS: 277 vs Eng, Edgbaston, 2003
100s: 22
1 Gautam Gambhir
2 Graeme Smith
3 Younis Khan
4
5 Andy Flower (wk)
6 Murray Goodwin
7 Andrew Flintoff
8 Daniel Vettori
9 Shane Warne (c)
10 Merv Dillon
11
I really like that top 3 - ALL of them average just on 50, and all 3 are unsung heroes - they just muck in and do the job.
So now Yudi has 2 picks to make: England and South Africa, and User you might as well start the Sri Lanka round whenever you're ready.
As for Bond vs Akhtar, yeah you really didn't have much choice. Bond is the best strike bowler NZ has had recently, even if his career was brief. Luckily I liked Vettori to play the support role for Warne I agree about NZ missing Bond though, I mentioned it in my Vettori write up that he averaged almost 10 less when Bond played. Bond helped that team a lot.
BTW, did you like my little dig I had at Sehwag in the Gambhir summary I wrote
Darn it, was looking for an opener this round and both have been picked.
Dave Houghton now moves to opening slot and AB fits in middle order. Messed up quite a bit as I didn't pick an opener early but still the team looks strong on both fronts now. Strong middle order and an attacking bowling unit.
Well AB opened for SA for quite a few Tests. He's been much better in the middle though. Or Dravid could open I guess to give you another option.
And just to tidy up...
Graeme Smith
I reckon Graeme Smith is one of world cricket's most underrated batsmen, and together with Gambhir, they must be 2 of the most underappreciated players going around. Smith has often had to open the batting on lively South African pitches and he averages only a smidge under 50 over an impressive career. Only Jacques Kallis has scored more runs for South Africa.
Interesting fact: Smith has never scored a 100 in a losing cause. Of his 22 100s, 15 have been in SA wins, and 7 in draws. So when Smith does well, South Africa does well.
Debut: vs Australia, Cape Town, 2002
Tests: 91
Runs: 7457
Average: 49.71
HS: 277 vs Eng, Edgbaston, 2003
100s: 22
1 Gautam Gambhir
2 Graeme Smith
3 Younis Khan
4
5 Andy Flower (wk)
6 Murray Goodwin
7 Andrew Flintoff
8 Daniel Vettori
9 Shane Warne (c)
10 Merv Dillon
11
I really like that top 3 - ALL of them average just on 50, and all 3 are unsung heroes - they just muck in and do the job.
So now Yudi has 2 picks to make: England and South Africa, and User you might as well start the Sri Lanka round whenever you're ready.