MasterBlaster76
ICC Chairman
So chances are, all the matches will be sucked up by Sky. They should be distributed between BBC and ITV; it's a nonsense that the National sport should be restricted so heavily to pay per view TV.
I see actually ESPN gained Setanta's rights: The Associated Press: ESPN to air live Premier League matches in BritainSo chances are, all the matches will be sucked up by Sky. They should be distributed between BBC and ITV; it's a nonsense that the National sport should be restricted so heavily to pay per view TV.
I see actually ESPN gained Setanta's rights: The Associated Press: ESPN to air live Premier League matches in Britain
It would have been illegal for Sky to take them all because Europe ruled one single broadcaster can't have a monopoly on Premier League matches. Although, they were expected to take on 23 of the 46 games on offer. I don't know how much it is going to cost.
If you are talking about 3pm kick offs, it is also illegal. Saturday afternoon games can't be shown live on British TV. It is legal in other countries, even Ireland, but not here.Talking of Sky, with the advent of the red button, I don't get why they can't show a live game on a Saturday afternoon and give us the ability to choose which one to watch (or at least give a reasonable selection, if not all of them)? They do it with the highlights at Football First, after all.
If you are talking about 3pm kick offs, it is also illegal. Saturday afternoon games can't be shown live on British TV. It is legal in other countries, even Ireland, but not here.
Apparently all the fans will stay at home and watch the game on the telly instead of going to watch their local team. Fair enough even if it's not true with the majority of fans, smaller clubs need all the help they can get.
ESPN best sign the Bunce man.
That's the reason. More fans would stay at home if the games were all on TV.True, I didn't think of that.