Australia in Bangladesh

What will the result be?

  • Aus win test, ODI

    Votes: 48 73.8%
  • Aus loss test, win ODI

    Votes: 1 1.5%
  • Aus win test, lose ODI

    Votes: 5 7.7%
  • Banglaesh win test, ODI

    Votes: 6 9.2%
  • Test drawn, Aus win ODI

    Votes: 3 4.6%
  • Test drawn, Bangladesh win ODI

    Votes: 2 3.1%

  • Total voters
    65
Well, I can't see Ponting declaring. Gillespie looks like a sweet machine at the rate he is playing. He'd probably get a short opening spell if they declare soon.

What I see is that Gillespie retires/gets out, give him enough time for a shower and let him rest while 2 new batsman are batting. ;) Sounds good to me.
 
angryangy said:
Clarkey could do with a 50 n.o. to boost his average.

Lol why not, thats what Bangladesh is for ;)
Geez our total is huge, I've been so obbessed with Dizzy's score that I forgot to see our total score.
 
Dizzy on 197.
If Ponting allows him to go on,he might end up breaking Wasim Akram's record too.
 
200 to dizzy the commontator didnt realise it was his 200 :p

Aussie declaired
 
Woooohoooo :clap what a knock by Dizzy. That last 10 to get to 200 came really quick. Dizzy is clearly a guy that doesn't get affected by the nervous 90s.
 
lmao i wonder who will share the new ball?

dizzy will be totally buggered.....perhaps Hussey or Ponting's right-arm mediums?? :p
 
I am absolutely stunned and speechless! 201 runs now and he's still growing strong. I don't know how Bangladesh is going to get this brick wall out! :)
I think we have a new candidate for our new opening batsman to replace Hayden. Awesome stuff there. I can't beleive it, but it's true!
 
duffarama said:
I am absolutely stunned and speechless! 201 runs now and he's still growing strong. I don't know how Bangladesh is going to get this brick wall out! :)
I think we have a new candidate for our new opening batsman to replace Hayden. Awesome stuff there. I can't beleive it, but it's true!

Welcome to the Aus in Bangladesh thread duffo :p

Whats wrong with Hayden? Hes going just fine. But we don't need an all rounder anymore. Time to give up on the Symonds/Waston experiement.
 
JASON GILLESPIE GETS 200 !!

There are a few lower-order batsmen who've made Test centuries (well if you make a test 100, you gotta give em some respect and not call them tailenders ! )..but a Double-Hundred is something really special..there are many accomplished batsmen who havent scored them, or taken very long to do it. So all credit to Dizzy.

Btw Wasim Akram has a Triple-Hundred..wow, some feat that :)
 
I mean exactly. Who needs Watson and Symonds when you have Lee, Gillespie and Warne. They can bat and bowl effectively well.
 
vizard said:
JASON GILLESPIE GETS 200 !!

There are a few lower-order batsmen who've made Test centuries (well if you make a test 100, you gotta give em some respect and not call them tailenders ! )..but a Double-Hundred is something really special..there are many accomplished batsmen who havent scored them, or taken very long to do it. So all credit to Dizzy.

Btw Wasim Akram has a Triple-Hundred..wow, some feat that :)

Wasim only has a large double ton. Not a triple :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top