No one said that. He's just pointing out one of the reasons that the Australian cricket team is a brilliant one. Gilchrist's performance was brilliant again. When I switched channels to check the score I saw New Zealand trailing by 462 runs. I thought, but hadn't they got just 300-odd for 5 yesterday? Just brilliant batting.squiz said:when did anyone say that we were a one man team?
squiz said:256 run partnership between Gilchrist and Martyn off only 46 overs as well. We're definetly going to miss Gilchrist when he retires. Gilchrist's 162 came off 146 balls :o Warney chipped in with a 50 off 37 balls as well
squiz said:256 run partnership between Gilchrist and Martyn off only 46 overs as well. We're definetly going to miss Gilchrist when he retires. Gilchrist's 162 came off 146 balls :o Warney chipped in with a 50 off 37 balls as well
New Zealand lack a good pace outfit with Oram and Bond missing. Perhaps Franklin will fill the gap but 47 overs is not amazingly high for a spin bowler, in a long innings. At least bowlers in India frequently do it. I guess it is different because they are expected to be seamer-friendly wickets.irottev said:Vettori OVERS:47 MAIDENS:5 RUNS:170 WICKETS:2