Australia's Tour of India - 7 ODI's

[formula1man]

Will Marsh be an instant selection? he should be.

 

[aussie1st]

Going by the article on cricinfo, they seem happy with Paine as opener and it sounded more likely that Voges would get the nod.

 

[SciD]

Paine and Watson will open. They have been unless Wato has broken down again.

 

[piriyanth]

Watson will definetly open.

Paine is too slow for middle and lower order, so it's better to keep him as an opener.

I don't think Marsh will mind going down the order. He has abilites to play the same role as Callum Ferguson.

 

[Leggie]

He will be missed no matter what. We'll see who'll be missing who when we are 11/3 with our 'great' Yuvraj gone and MS Dhoni being crap again.

That's the biggest load of rubbish I've heard in a long time.

Dhoni - 2nd ODI: West Indies v India at Kingston, Jun 28, 2009 | Cricket Scorecard | Cricinfo.com

Yuvraj - 2nd ODI: India v England at Indore, Nov 17, 2008 | Cricket Scorecard | Cricinfo.com



They're both perfectly capable of doing what Dravid did.

 

[aussie1st]

I don't think Marsh will mind going down the order. He has abilites to play the same role as Callum Ferguson.

Don't know about that, Marsh problem before he got injured was not taking enough singles. But he could bring a big hitting side to the lower order but Voges is the better bet for the middle order since he can bowl and his fielding his first class.

 

[jkartik]

That's the biggest load of rubbish I've heard in a long time.

Dhoni - 2nd ODI: West Indies v India at Kingston, Jun 28, 2009 | Cricket Scorecard | Cricinfo.com

Yuvraj - 2nd ODI: India v England at Indore, Nov 17, 2008 | Cricket Scorecard | Cricinfo.com



They're both perfectly capable of doing what Dravid did.

by that rationale, even agarkar scored a century up the order...so hes a better batsman than dravid ?

 

[shravi]

by that rationale, even agarkar scored a century up the order...so hes a better batsman than dravid ?

Everyone is better than Dravid. Dravid sucks. He's too old, his bones are too brittle, he can't run, he can't walk, he can't field and he can't even bat.

:sarcasm

 

[Params7]

Everyone is better than Dravid. Dravid sucks. He's too old, his bones are too brittle, he can't run, he can't walk, he can't field and he can't even bat.

:sarcasm

The Great Indian Wall will never go brittle!

 

[shravi]

The Great Indian Wall will never go brittle!

Sarcasm...

 

[SciD]

Everyone is better than Dravid. Dravid sucks. He's too old, his bones are too brittle, he can't run, he can't walk, he can't field and he can't even bat.

:sarcasm

He is old, he cannot run.

 

[jkartik]

He is old, he cannot run.

if dadaji can run, then so can he !

 

[shravi]

He is old, he cannot run.

Of course he can run. He's extraordinarily fit for someone his age. He's fit enough to be playing ODI cricket. It's just not an excuse.

 

[Leggie]

by that rationale, even agarkar scored a century up the order...so hes a better batsman than dravid ?

I didn't say they were better than Dravid. I said they were equally capable of doing what Dravid did/does.

 

[shravi]

Just noticed something rather ironic... Dravid's my avatar and Kohli's my signature... Need to change that...