angryangy
ICC Chairman
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2004
I don't blame them, Swann found some ripping deliveries in the surface. I don't think England would have batted particularly well against him in full flight today.
When you look at a follow-on score, you might also want to look at it from the other end. 419 was simply too many runs. Bangladesh were a little unlucky with a couple of lbws, but if they were better at sustaining pressure (rather than squirting it out sporadically) they may well have bowled England out for 300 or less.
When you look at a follow-on score, you might also want to look at it from the other end. 419 was simply too many runs. Bangladesh were a little unlucky with a couple of lbws, but if they were better at sustaining pressure (rather than squirting it out sporadically) they may well have bowled England out for 300 or less.