Don Bradman Cricket in the Press

"Review sponsored by shopto.net"??? When did that become a thing?

I'm not saying for a second it influenced the content of the review (it's bang in line with many reviews elsewhere), but really? I've never seen that before!

Yeah, kills it and never knew that existed - at least they are upfront about it, surprised it's not a 10/10 on that basis :)

Although, maybe sponsored just means they supplied the review copy?

Edit: obviously we didn't sponsor them.... Red Ant Studio indeed....
 
Last edited:
Yeah, kills it and never knew that existed - at least they are upfront about it, surprised it's not a 10/10 on that basis :)

Although, maybe sponsored just means they supplied the review copy?

Edit: obviously we didn't sponsor them.... Red Ant Studio indeed....

Agree about them being upfront - that's good. Although shouldn't ever be the case. Even if they just supplied a review copy, I suspect they would want a guarantee that if it was a negative review it would be destroyed rather than published. I've heard of that before (although never when it was admitted to be the case!)

And yes. Another triumph for Red Ant. How long since they closed now? You'd have thought the confusion would have finished by now! Maybe you need to change the colour of the ant in your logo. :)
 
^ Haha...wouldn't that be something. Now only if we knew someone with good photoshop skills :spy
 
The utter wrong thing about the review, even though much was a good read, was the sound being given 6 out of 10. Okay, turn the commentary off, set those speakers up nice and loud and enjoy the best sound ever produced in a cricket game by six squillion miles...........
 
The Cricketer review. 4/5.
attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 188

Users who are viewing this thread

Top