Stephen Bailey
Executive member
Howabout Bakewell tart for Blackwell? ![Smile :) :)](/forums/styles/planetcricket/xenforo/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smile :) :)](/forums/styles/planetcricket/xenforo/smilies/smile.gif)
Englishandproud said:Yes there may well be a problem with that, but surely if it his is nickname, such as Freddie, Harmy, Hoggy, etc. It should be used as it sounds better then, 'Here comes Black upto bowl'![]()
stevie said:Howabout Bakewell tart for Blackwell?![]()
Englishandproud said:Good one stevie that is.
Exactly my point Gas.
You could also have Monty 'Bernard' Panasar, try and figure that one out.![]()
Montogomery (Monty) Burns's father?Englishandproud said:lol no and no Gas.
The great Bernard Montgomery, was also known as Monty
You watch now people will ask who he was.
newzolt said:It's a great paradox that the rather inexperienced English spin attack dependent on debutants had a greater impact and was more impressive than the more experienced spin duo of India sharing 700 odd wickets between them.
It was the extra batsman that made the difference in the previous match for India (Mohammad Kaif). If it wasn't for him, we could have very well lost the match. However, I still have confidence in using a 5-prong attack, because I think the Indian batting collapse in the first innings was a one-off thing.s2sschan said:Yuvraj and Munaf in, Raina and VRV out. Interesting to see if Munaf can make it to the XI. He can if:
A) India play five bowlers. With Pathan and Dhoni playing as well as they have been, India can afford five bowlers. If five batsmen can't do it, then what's the point?
B) Drop Harbhajan. Seems unlikely because he did well against England the last time at Mohali. Could happen if we get a Seaming Wicket at Mohali.
P.S. The last Test was a Draw. Nobody won. The psychological edge thing's been overhyped on and also off this forum.