War
Chairman of Selectors
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2010
- Online Cricket Games Owned
How long did it take for Flintoff to look anything other than ordinary in the England side? 3/4 years? Flintoff turned brilliant due to chances, world class all-rounders don't just come from county cricket to international standard.
I believe Wright will make it because at 23/24, he's in good form and has developed impressively in the last year, his work ethic is outstanding and he has some solid natural talent in all three areas of the game. I'm not saying he's a shoe-in for all England sides right now, but give him 2 years in the side (like we gave Flintoff) and we can have a very good all-rounder, sure he will never have Flintoff's pace and bounce (although mid 80s isn't bad), but I have no qualm in reckoning his test batting can be better. Flintoff was good, very good, but don't forget the time he took to get where he was/is.
As i mentioned before. Flintoff should have never played test cricket anytime before India 2001, since he was joke cricketer before then. That was a mistake by the England selectors.
Flintoff became a quality test cricketer because he was ready for tests by 2001 & he continued to develop as the years went on. Luke Wright isn't ready for tests now (i have my doubts whether he ever will be), thus should not be anywhere near to test side.