Repeat after me, I, Lee, am holiour than thou...If you followed a team who wasnt in the Premier you would learn to take goals no matter how they come!
![Wink ;) ;)](/forums/styles/planetcricket/xenforo/smilies/wink.gif)
Repeat after me, I, Lee, am holiour than thou...If you followed a team who wasnt in the Premier you would learn to take goals no matter how they come!
Jagielka is just one for the people who want representation from teams outside the "top 4". Same with the Barry brigade. They'll cry injustice and favouritism towards United, Chelsea etc, he must be amazing because he's so underrated (the irony being that these people are overrating them). Same with Schwarzer now too, yes he stands out at Fulham, and yes he's had a decent season, but are you honestly telling me he's had a better season than a man who kept 15 consecutive clean sheets?
As for Lampard, well, I can see how he would be nominated and wouldn't mind too much, although I still maintain a hell of a lot of his goals come from deflections.
No! Your attitude is the one that I'm getting at! That if you think the top 4 players have been the best then you must only watch the top 4 play and must be racist/sexist or any other card that can be used.
I just go on merit, if a player outside the top 4 plays well I'll say so. But often, if a player outside the top 4 is doing well, then he gets snapped up by someone in the top 4. Quite simple really.
Van Der Sar has been excellent the season barring one or two games. I'm not going to say Schwarzer should be in there and use him as a token like other people have done.
That's just it though, you're saying Schwarzer just because he stands out at Fulham. It needs to go to who has been the better player, and although Schwarzer stands out more than VDS at their respective clubs, VDS has been the better player.