India in England/Ireland/Scotland

[sammy]

English men must be worried now.

 

[SaiSrini]

oh god! that looked plumb to me.

edge. didnt look like an edge at all.

 

[Eddie]

English men must be worried now.

not really no wkts down to the pitch.or bowling..

upper cut caught 3rd man.. shoulder arms to a straight ball and was bowled..

still loads of batting to come

oh and there goes khans match fees

 

[legspinner@fred]

And India were 30 odd for 3, with a short batting line up, so England going at 5 an over chasing 210 batting down to 9, i'm not swetting on it at the moment, honestly.

 

[pal]

Extremely questionable decision from the umpire. It doesn't hurt to have an extra player, I s'pose.

 

[legspinner@fred]

Well snicko showed that it WASN'T out so that isn't really fair to question an umpire for getting a decision 100% right.
I'm being as biased as possible here, it's fun.

 

[pal]

Well snicko showed that it WASN'T out so that isn't really fair.
I'm being as biased as possible here, it's fun.

That's part of the fun of being a fan. You've got to back your team and players (and perhaps bash the opposition), no matter what.

 

[SaiSrini]

not really no wkts down to the pitch.or bowling..

upper cut caught 3rd man.. shoulder arms to a straight ball and was bowled..

still loads of batting to come

oh and there goes khans match fees

nonsense.. cook's wicket was to the bowler and his variation. prior was beaten by the pace (agarkar is not known to bowl that much pace).

And India were 30 odd for 3, with a short batting line up, so England going at 5 an over chasing 210 batting down to 9, i'm not swetting on it at the moment, honestly.

I dont care if India lose. I want them to lose with a fight.

 

[legspinner@fred]

Well..I know some India fans who don't seem to back their team when it loses now and again!
Let's all be bias to our teams, even though we have been for the past 295 pages i'll start.

England cruising.

I dont care if India lose. I want them to lose with a fight.

And it will be a better game if they do, I hope so to.

 

[Eddie]

nonsense.. cook's wicket was to the bowler and his variation. prior was beaten by the pace (agarkar is not known to bowl that much pace).

must have been his 70mph ball

 

[jkartik]

must have been his 70mph ball

definitely can generate much pace than mascarenhas !

nonsense.. cook's wicket was to the bowler and his variation. prior was beaten by the pace (agarkar is not known to bowl that much pace).

agreed ! plus, bell lost his wicket due to his stupidity

 

[Eddie]

definitely can generate much pace than mascarenhas !

lol my granny bowls faster than dimmi

but she's not as accurate

 

[sd92]

I was looking through a folder called My Pictures and stumbled across this gem of a photo...haha. its Agarkars baby photo lol

 

[sammy]

english men still not worried ?

 

[Leicester Fox]

why don't you worry more about the cricket than how the England fans are doing