New Zealand in England May - June 2013

Rewatching the highlights at the break, it's amazing that England have batted so brilliantly, but with some crazy shots in between making them look a terrible side!

Take out the wickets and it's a collection of beautiful shots.

Put the bad ones together, and it's crazy bad.

Poor shots from England costing too many wickets, compounded by so many so quickly. Once Compton had gone early the worst thing Cook could do was toss his wicket away. That opened the door for a second quick wicket and you're always going to struggle at 18/3 unless the pitch is a road or something.

Bell then helped Trott in a recovery mission before tossing his wicket away, I could go on but unfortunately England batsmen didn't. With only Trott batting for more than 64 minutes there was no real prospect of a decent total, at least 250 would have been something, but not enough batsmen placed value on their wicket.

To compound it both kwikfit openers have batted about three times as long as England's second most durable batsman, nearly three hours apiece. Puts the pitch into perspective, I've never really rated Finn or Broad and top bowlers step up when they are needed whereas England bowlers usually only turn up when things are going well for them.



England need one of their bowlers to claw this back, if they can get the kiwis out for 300-350 then there could still be a game on. The kiwis must make most of this advantage with it only being a four day game now, if England get 350-400 in their 2nd innings it may get a bit tight depending of course how far the kiwis get in front.

Sad thing is England often go right back into defensive mode, Yawn was a bad bugger for it. You might slow the run rate down, but you also reduce wicket taking chances by spreading the field. Of course England can only blame themselves with half the batsmen throwing away their wickets costing I'd estimate at least 100 runs.
 
Well that went pretty tits-up. As I said we do have a habit of doing this in NZ. I can see England losing this test now.
 
Bangladesh or Zimbabwe would have given much better competition to New Zealand :P

Now with the recent performance from Australia and England, Ashes will be more competitive than ever. Let'see which Ashes team will pass the 200 runs first! ;)

On serious note - I yet to catch highlights but either NZ bowlers have suddenly become World Class or it was just retarded batting by England batsman. I like to think latter.
 
Yeah it might be a sticky wicket cause of the rain yesterday, but it mustn't have been that hard to bat on. Since New Zealand are 131 for 0 in reply to England's 167 all out
 
NZ must have borrowed some pitch tampering equipment from the BCCI. Probably why the DRS conveniently wasn't working late in the day. Must pick up on something :spy
 
New Zeland dominating the match. They are in a solid position so I really hope they can make it count and don't collapse.
 
Rained yesterday. Wicket with a lot of juice on it and England sent in to bat first on it every minute ticking by the Kiwi's knew it was drying out making batting easier. Exact happened and NZ used the juice in the pitch to roll over England. Tomorrow morning when there is a bit of juice there for England will be interesting and England are far from out of this match. They can fight for a draw easily here as the Kiwi's have to put the turbo's on to get a lead and to bowl them out as I am sure they do not want to chase many on the 4th innings
 
Rained yesterday. Wicket with a lot of juice on it and England sent in to bat first on it every minute ticking by the Kiwi's knew it was drying out making batting easier. Exact happened and NZ used the juice in the pitch to roll over England.

The decision to bowl was mainly based on the overhead conditions, because it was extremely overcast when the toss was made, and hence the rain that started half an hour later. There wasn't much in the pitch at the start of the England innings. Southee was getting one to seam back in every now and then, and the amount of swing was nothing unusual. I only watched the first half and hour (and the last hour or so), so I didn't see Wagner bowl live, but that's been his homeground for the last five years or so so I assume he just knew how to get the most out of a pitch not offering a lot.
 
Last edited:
The pitch did very little. If anyone bothered to watch it, the England batman all threw away their wickets.

Shocking batting on the first day of a test match. Pitch seems fairly benign, so can still definitely get a draw here, but I could count the amount of times England have turned shocking starts into draws on one finger.

----------

Also, I think I might have jumped the gun on trolling the India v Australia thread after this performance so far :lol
 
This is where we struggled with Strauss as Captain and look like doing so with Cook in charge. Just a lack of invention when nothing is going too well. Think of other good Captains who try different things, just to see if they work. Our only plan seems to bowl to their favourite shot and hope they hit it in the air, which could take a while.
 
On the plus side, things haven't gone too badly for too long in recent times ;)
 
I'd rather we didn't gain that arrogance that made the Aussie sides so hated though. We just seem to have forgotten what got us to being one of the best sides around. Which is planning for the worst as well as the best case scenario.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top