Sureshot said:Is SkySports down for anyone here watching on NTL in the UK?
I've got a black screen.
As I say that it works.
20 minutes down time. Useless plurks.
Can't go an England Test summer without a collapse can we?
:crying
anakwalajinn said:My personal opinion is that the series score might have been different if Pakistan had Rana, Akhtar, Asif & Malik all the matches.
England can't "blame" on the injuries because their "reserves" are doing a great job and the lads need thumbs up for that!
But Pakistan can "blame" on the injuries, just look at what Asif has done and England are 100-5! They would never been 100-5 with Sami in the attack!
Sad, but true!
MUFC1987 said:As David Lloyd would say, it's start the car time. Where is Geraint Jones when you need him?
anakwalajinn said:My personal opinion is that the series score might have been different if Pakistan had Rana, Akhtar, Asif & Malik all the matches.
England can't "blame" on the injuries because their "reserves" are doing a great job and the lads need thumbs up for that!
But Pakistan can "blame" on the injuries, just look at what Asif has done and England are 100-5! They would never been 100-5 with Sami in the attack!
Sad, but true!
But the series is now over and no need of fighting over it!
My personal feeling says 5-0 to Pakistan in One Day if not any injuries!
MUFC1987 said:As David Lloyd would say, it's start the car time. Where is Geraint Jones when you need him?
ZexyZahid said:Apart from Flintoff, I don't think that Simon Jones, Vaughan and Ashley Giles are big difference makers. I saw only Jones making his mark in the Ashes, but apart from that I didn't notice anything. The 'replacements' are doing good enough and even better then them.
For Pakistan Shoaib Malik has established himself as an opener, Rana Naved is an useful ODI bowler and about Shoaib Akhtar everybody remembers, when England toured in Pakistan, he change the match.
It looks like Cook has settled himself.
Sureshot said:Someones deluded.
Read is doing well here 26*
England need their tail to produce runs, 250 would be good after our failure.
Seriously I can't believe people still think Jones is better than Read at the moment, it's laughable.
Sureshot said:Don't get me wrong I'm not saying Read is perfect (Not at you Evo) but he is scoring runs, which is what we need.
He looks a bit frail at times but he does put the bad balls away.
Is it just me, or does Mahmood seem a better option than Plunkett?
Eddie said:For me plunkett's the better bowler