s2sschan said:What is happenning??? Oh Please!
A quality International team thrashed the living daylights out of a bunch of Part-Time Sunday Cricketers. Does that surprise anybody?
Sri Lanka deserves 100% Credit.
I am tired of hearing the "usual English excuses".
He was playing for the Netherlands, not for Holland.anakwalajinn said:Yeah, especially "Kerzeeve".
WoW, I am starting to get a big fan of him!
The same age as me and making 47 in his debut for Holland against Sri Lanka?
I was speaking English, in which Netherlands is the correct name for the country.Sureshot said:
I can be even more pedantic, he was playing for the Nederlands
Or doesn't that count?
andrew_nixon said:I was speaking English, in which Netherlands is the correct name for the country.
Just to point out to people that Holland is actually a region in the Netherlands. Using Holland to refer to the whole of the Netherlands is a bit like using England to refer to the whole of the United Kingdom, but I digress.
Not that I have noticed. Netherlands should not have ODI status.evertonfan said:Is there anything you don't know?
Of course they should. They won it fair and square after a series of tournaments involving almost 50 other countries.wolf said:Not that I have noticed. Netherlands should not have ODI status.
But they are not good enough.andrew_nixon said:Of course they should. They won it fair and square after a series of tournaments involving almost 50 other countries.
You miss the point of the awarding of temporary ODI status. If they're not good enough to have it, they wouldn't have won it. They have clearly shown that they are one of the top 6 non-test nations, therefore under the rules of the ICC, they get ODI status. If they aren't good enough in 2009, they'll lose it.wolf said:But they are not good enough.