MUFC1987 said:Good to see Clarke in the squad, a good batsman down the order. :happy
Chapple isn't a batsman. Clarke is the closest thing we have to a batting all rounder after Flintoff.evertonfan said:And Chapple isn't?
Good to see Clarke in the squad, a good batsman down the order
MUFC1987 said:Chapple isn't a batsman. Clarke is the closest thing we have to a batting all rounder after Flintoff.
Anyways, I expect the team to be:
Trescothick
Joyce
Strauss
Pietersen
Collingwood
Dalrymple
Clarke
Read
Gough
Broad
Harmison.
Perhaps Yardy will play (instead of Clarke) on a turning track and maybe Lewis over Broad is the ball is swinging, or in the team depending on Gough's injuries. I'd like to see Joyce at number 4 or 5, but I expect him to open the batting.
want Yardy in that squad and then it'll be fine. I'm still unhappy over the axeing of Chapple; England's neglection of him is criminal.
Only in recent years after he's got over his injury problems. At the end of the day, to replace Flintoff, who bats at number 5 or 6, you need a batsman who can bowl a bit, rather than a bowler who can bat a bit. If he batted at Number 8 or something, I'd probably say that we needed a better bowler, but as it is, we need someone who can bat.Drewska said:Chapple isn't a batsman. Clarke is the closest thing we have to a batting all rounder after Flintoff.
Flintoffs a bowling all-rounders
Only players that the selectors have overlooked though. There are very few all rounders in county Cricket who can bat and bowl to a decent level, unless we manage to convince Sean Ervine to play for England. I admit it's not ideal, but then it very rarely is. In County cricket, a top six batsman who bowls pace, apart from Clarke and Collingwood, there is literally nobody.evertonfan said:Eddie was right, Clarke really does average only 9 in ODI's. He deserves a second chance I agree, but I think we have better players at our disposal.
MUFC1987 said:Only in recent years after he's got over his injury problems. At the end of the day, to replace Flintoff, who bats at number 5 or 6, you need a batsman who can bowl a bit, rather than a bowler who can bat a bit. If he batted at Number 8 or something, I'd probably say that we needed a better bowler, but as it is, we need someone who can bat.
MUFC1987 said:In County cricket, a top six batsman who bowls pace, apart from Clarke and Collingwood, there is literally nobody.
I've said in this thread that he could work very well at Number 8 for England, but in the top 6 you need people who can score centuries. He's never scored a One Day century, so to expect him to come into the England team and hold his own is asking a bit much.evertonfan said:You could maybe add Dimitri Mascarenhas to that list. Shane Warne holds him in very high regard.
MUFC1987 said:He's never scored a One Day century, so to expect him to come into the England team and hold his own is asking a bit much.