South African Tour of India 2010

Looking pretty ominous for the Indians thus far, oh dear is their "world champion" status in danger already :laugh

Thank feck the saffers have FINALLY dropped Prince down the order.

PRINCE'S OPENING RUN

vs IND : 0 & DNB
vs ENG : 19 & DNB, 0 & 15, 2 & 16, 45 & 0
vs AUS : 150 & DNB

Ironically the Test before his "promotion" he scored 162no. He scored his 150 opening against the aussies and just 97 runs in EIGHT innings thereafter. After it worked the once you can understand giving it a bash, but after scores of 19, 0 & 15 surely someone could have concluded a lot quicker that his 150 was a one-off and him opening wasn't a permanent solution.

The other irony is that his replacement is set on 99no and could make a hundred.

SOUTH AFRICAN CURRENT PLAYERS (OPENING)

50.56 Smith : 134 inns, 6540 runs
43.00 Amla : 1 inns, 43 runs
39.97 McKenzie : 35 inns, 1279 runs
36.14 De Villiers : 35 inns, 1265 runs
27.44 Prince : 9 inns, 247 runs
20.00 Khan : 1 inns, 20 runs

Although Kallis might make a decent fist or better of it, he has never opened in Tests. He does average 26.20 in ODIs opening, but averaging 45.92 at no 3 and 47.71 at no 4 in ODIs, 49.78 at no 3 and 62.85 at no 4 in Tests is probably the reason he doesn't move much from those slots.

While I'm looking at current players, the table of players used in the past two years makes interesting reading

"CURRENT" TEST PLAYERS"

34 West Indies
25 New Zealand
24 India, Australia
22 England
21 South Africa, Pakistan, Bangladesh
20 Sri Lanka

Two of England's 22 are "one Test wonders" (Khan and Pattinson), Shah, Trott, Bresnan and Onions have yet to reach double figures while Ambrose only got as far as 11 caps and Bopara 10. Shame the windies had to argue over money, although that's not too surprising. South Africa have EIGHT players among those 21 with less than 10 caps, Petersen not included which would make it nine in 22 (stats pre 2nd Test)
 
the only reason he scored 150 is because he was full of confidence after that 162. after the duck ████ changed
 
if it was India batting and was in this position he would have :banana2

so you can see why rest of the world complains when you guys bat on dead tracks and score. but then you people say "you hate because we are doing good, you are jealous "
 
if it was India batting and was in this position he would have :banana2

so you can see why rest of the world complains when you guys bat on dead tracks and score. but then you people say "you hate because we are doing good, you are jealous "

go check out the IND VS SL thread when the 700 run feasts were going on and you'll find MOST of the indians (including myself) were complaining about the dead tracks EVEN when the indians were batting.

get your facts right before claiming anything sherlock!
 
Amla + Kallis + Dead Indian Wickets + Crap Indian Bowling = :sleep:sleep:sleep:sleep:sleep

Flaw in the theory.

because

Amla + Kallis + Dead Indian Wickets + Crap Indian Bowling = :sleep:sleep:sleep:sleep:sleep = India being dominated

and

India being dominated = :happy:happy:happy:happy:happy

but

:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy <> :sleep:sleep:sleep:sleep:sleep

Q.E.D. ;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top