End Game Star Wars Mafia - End Mafia(Surendar) & Third Party (Fake Passport) Won

[Villain]

Pretty much anything can be X shot restricted...

Exactly, BTW half of the players are still yet to post while I've seen some reading the thread and leaving.

I don't know what to make of it? If you can't invest minutes for the game, shouldn't have signed up and wasted ours. I'd rather lynch the non contributors either way they are no help/non existent and make the game boring(which is not what we play for).

 

[Fake Passport]

I'd rather lynch the non contributors

This. Absent a definate scum read or amazing activity levels I'll back you with this today. How about when JR posts the 'X time till deadline' and pick a candidate then?

 

[Villain]

This. Absent a definate scum read or amazing activity levels I'll back you with this today. How about when JR posts the 'X time till deadline' and pick a candidate then?

That sounds right, I don't mean to say you should be here all the time but only 5-10 minutes a day going through the post and posting something shouldn't hurt anyone.

Honestly, I'd rather lose by lynching them if that makes the game interesting and fun to play as that's what we are here for.[DOUBLEPOST=1499931574][/DOUBLEPOST]Sorry for whole post in bold, it happened by mistake somehow due to me posting through my old phone.

 

[asprin]

Alright, the way I see it I find three people to be suggesting things that are not town favorable.

CaptainCremer - for suggesting that the investigative PR should reveal something. Although he did change his approach later by suggesting the PR to reveal the investigated person indirectly, the idea itself is quite bold given that it's only Day 2.

Villain - He seems too eager to lynch someone. He was also very eager for the day to end on Day 1. This definitely raises the alarm as I find his reason to lynch based on activity of a person to be very scummy. Active or not, one should never underestimate the power of a vote. I'm, for that matter, totally against this and do not take anyone suggesting this lightly. Big FoS

FP - for supporting Villain with regards to inactive players. Though it is highly unlikely that a scum player would do that this openly, by agreeing with Villain he has put himself under the radar.

 

[zwarrior]

FP - for supporting Villain with regards to inactive players. Though it is highly unlikely that a scum player would do that this openly, by agreeing with Villain he has put himself under the radar.

Tbh, they both might have posted that due to frustration of players not being active here.

 

[Villain]

.Villain - He seems too eager to lynch someone. He was also very eager for the day to end on Day 1. This definitely raises the alarm as I find his reason to lynch based on activity of a person to be very scummy. Active or not, one should never underestimate the power of a vote. I'm, for that matter, totally against this and do not take anyone suggesting this lightly. Big FoS

Alright, I'll sleep for the rest of the game and just vote when it's required. Deal?

I was up for discussion on Day 1 and one of the few who tried something and I was never eager to end Day 1. There were quite a few who were eager to end the day but you don't seem to question them.

 

[asprin]

Alright, I'll sleep for the rest of the game and just vote when it's required. Deal?

This reeks frustration. All the more reason for me to believe I may be right about you.

There were quite a few who were eager to end the day but you don't seem to question them

I definitely will if they seem odd to me. They didn't but you did.

 

[Villain]

Yes, I'm not happy with the activity not frustrated. You can think whatever you like as I have no control over that.[DOUBLEPOST=1499935543][/DOUBLEPOST]And what a great tactic of a mafia it'd be to suggest people to lynch the non existent.

 

[swacker]

I was suspicious of Villain during day one, considering he was not willing to add to the conversation, and showed signs of wanting the day to end.

You found Villain suspicious just because he lynched you on Day 1? Not only did you lynch him back but wanted him to unlynch you.

 

[Villain]

Tbh, they both might have posted that due to frustration of players not being active here.

Somebody got it, thanks.[DOUBLEPOST=1499936118][/DOUBLEPOST]

You found Villain suspicious just because he lynched you on Day 1? Not only did you lynch him back but wanted him to unlynch you.

Yes that seemed a bit odd too and so did his tactic for the Cop to come out later defending by saying he/she should indirectly get the name out but that's risky too. I'll wait for his answer.

 

[CremerCurrans]

You found Villain suspicious just because he lynched you on Day 1? Not only did you lynch him back but wanted him to unlynch you.

I explained my reason back on day 1, if you are truly interested, go and have a read of my posts.[DOUBLEPOST=1499937494][/DOUBLEPOST]

This. Absent a definate scum read or amazing activity levels I'll back you with this today. How about when JR posts the 'X time till deadline' and pick a candidate then?

Were you playing Villain to see what his response would be?

 

[Fake Passport]

This. Absent a definate scum read or amazing activity levels I'll back you with this today. How about when JR posts the 'X time till deadline' and pick a candidate then?

Were you playing Villain to see what his response would be?

In a sence yes, in a sence no. I will analyse everything anyone says in a sense, especially in response to my post/lynch/accusations etc.

On the other hand, I do tend to vote inactives, check my meta...

It won't stop me being suss of and lynching villain if I get that vibe, and check with him, but I think it's safe to say he'd vote me if the vibes were right.

 

[El Loco]

Clai ming isn't the right play ATM I don't think. Even if everyone did, would we necessarily believe it? If it was an open setup and we knew there was a doc/cop combo or something like that then perhaps, but we are essentially in Day 1.

First vote of the day, likely change but putting money whetey mouth is so to speak...
Lynch - CaptainCremer

At the very least you should have claimed something, what you've done is either soft claimed vanilla/3rd party or scum...[DOUBLEPOST=1499919724][/DOUBLEPOST]Re - Vanilla/3rd Party or scum. Maybe showing my age here, but as Meatloaf says. 2 out of 3 ain't bad.

Surely nobody ever intentionally soft-claims vanilla lol.
But soft-claims in general are a good idea, a no kill is never a good reason for the town to let their guard down.
I think I've seen enough roles with quirks in them not be lulled into a false sense of security.
I don't have an issue with CaptainCremer wanting to move the game forward, but personally calling someone to out is always a red flag.

All I can point this to at this point though is perhaps a roleblock or a doctor of some sort, you usually get indications of this by somebody going after someone they think they targeted in the night, or being over-friendly/fiercely protective of the person they protected, but the justification will only be in the mind of the person making the accusation, so that is something to cautiously watch out for.

As for the notion that prolific posters can be more scummy than inactive ones, it makes the game very difficult because sometimes even those playing as town find a way to incriminate themselves which has gotten very frustrating in the past.
I think Swacker expressed something along similar lines on Day 1 where he said he didn't want to post for fear of being aggressive for no reason? (Take me up on this if i've misquoted you).
This is why I try to analyse play with a bit more scrutiny now but it really is a pain in the rear.

 

[swacker]

As for the notion that prolific posters can be more scummy than inactive ones, it makes the game very difficult because sometimes even those playing as town find a way to incriminate themselves which has gotten very frustrating in the past.
I think Swacker expressed something along similar lines on Day 1 where he said he didn't want to post for fear of being aggressive for no reason? (Take me up on this if i've misquoted you).
This is why I try to analyse play with a bit more scrutiny now but it really is a pain in the rear.

yea, in my previous games, people (townies) see aggressive as definitely scam.

Despite answering to others' questions which I had answers, found myself being lynched.

 

[CremerCurrans]

In a sence yes, in a sence no. I will analyse everything anyone says in a sense, especially in response to my post/lynch/accusations etc.

On the other hand, I do tend to vote inactives, check my meta...

It won't stop me being suss of and lynching villain if I get that vibe, and check with him, but I think it's safe to say he'd vote me if the vibes were right.

Fair point.