aussie1st said:
Any team can win an ODI match. They just need everything to click. Aus of course more times than not click. SL have the batters to put up a good score and the bowlers to bowl teams out cheaply. Just they aren't clicking especially their batting.
That's why the VB Series is a genuine gauge of the 3 competing teams. A lucky win to an inferior team ought to be offset by several defeats.
I don't believe SL have the batsmen. Looking at the past 12 months, the experienced campaigners in Atapattu, Arnold, Jayawardene and Sangakkara
are chief run scores. However, none of them have really fired, just 3 ODI centuries (by comparison, India's batsmen have picked up 11) and aside from Mubarak's 53 on recall to the team, Atapattu has the highest average, a marginal 38 for the past 12 months.
Now, they aren't really atrocious statistics, but they clearly don't spark fear in the hearts of their enemies. These players aren't power hitters, though Sangakkara and Jayawardene do play a threshing brand of cricket, the team scores slowly, particularly compared to most other teams. If they inspire anything at all beneficial, it is complacency.
Bowling on the other hand looks capable. Dilshan, Maharoof and Murali are bowling quite well, though again not exceptional and certainly Murali is performing below potential. On current form though, this is where they can really win matches from. Perhaps these issues can be addressed as a lack of match practice and will fade in the long VB series. Judging by India's success against them, however, they face looming defeat from Australia and South Africa.