Cant blame DRS much.If it was not there still the problem would have been the same and decision would have been Not Out.I support DRS because having something to respond is better than nothing anyhow.That Johnson LBW review is why the DRS makes no sense.
The ball is clearly hitting the stumps, and a substantial part of the stumps at that, and yet just because the Umpire originally ruled N.o., N.o. stands. Can you not see the ball hitting the stumps ppl !? Does the ICC really think that unless half the ball is hititng the stumps the bails would not dislodge or something?
Had the umpire given it out, like he really should have, Johnson would have been on his way. The Umpire's call thing makes most LBW reviews absolute nonsense.
Depending on the Ump's call, the ball can be hitting the stumps in the same place, and yet sometimes it can be out and sometimes not out !!
Although I agrees with you on some changes to be made on the LBW issue.