lol so far for Tremlett's five-for. He sure as heck didn't deserve one for his display today, so I'm glad he didn't get it. He was wayward...bowling everywhere. And was too far from the offstump to actually trouble the batsmen on many occassions.
Being dismissed three times in a row in very similar fashion are signs of a weakness. You can ignore it, but I am sure he has a shred more cricketing intelligence in his gray matter.yes that hundred in the last match against your left armers is a massive weakness...
since half your attack bowls leftarm.. then he's bound to get out to one eventually...
lol so far for Tremlett's five-for. He sure as heck didn't deserve one for his display today, so I'm glad he didn't get it. He was wayward...bowling everywhere. And was too far from the offstump to actually trouble the batsmen on many occassions.
Being dismissed three times in a row in very similar fashion are signs of a weakness. You can ignore it, but I am sure he has a shred more cricketing intelligence in his gray matter.
Being dismissed three times in a row in very similar fashion are signs of a weakness. You can ignore it, but I am sure he has a shred more cricketing intelligence in his gray matter.
most of the england crickets have no manners and zaheer was just teaching them some manners
By 'this guy' i'm presuming you mean the whiny little gobshite with an ego bigger than his actual talent?
Sure, same here. Because then they would all be spent up by one good innings, huh? That means that Strauss, Vaughan and Cook, not to mention Pietersen, are already used up. That leaves Bell, Collingwood and Prior and they don't look in too good touch.he made planty of runs averaging over 50 this series?
wow i wish all our batsman had that weakness..
India do have plenty of overs to play with, but the first sniff of bad light and England will be off.