smssia0112
Chairman of Selectors
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2005
He wasn't so good against Australia though.I hope Anderson goes on to get 10 in this match;
a) Because he's a legend
b) So he can stick the selectors stupidity down their throats.
He wasn't so good against Australia though.I hope Anderson goes on to get 10 in this match;
a) Because he's a legend
b) So he can stick the selectors stupidity down their throats.
He wasn't so good against Australia though.
Am not saying that england bowled bad they bowled very well, however indias batters did not put away the bad balls and that put them under pressure. Tendulkar wants his name on the honours board he may have to in the 2nd innings not just him. That is for india win or draw
RP Singh to beat Gillispie's record as a nightwatchman ! No? Okay....
Aus5892 said:He wasn't so good against Australia though.
c) To improve his fairly >> UGLY << Test Bowling Average of 38 aswell.I hope Anderson goes on to get 10 in this match;
a) Because he's a legend
b) So he can stick the selectors stupidity down their throats.
Since when did Ganguly become one of the top 3 players in World Cricket?Sarcasm LOL, so because he wasnt good against Australia he is a poor bowler. Yeh, ok. He has proven his worth at test level, taking a 5fer against a top side. Getting the wickets of 3 of the best players in world cricket, Dravid, Tendulkar and Ganguly proves his talent.
Since when did Ganguly become one of the top 3 players in World Cricket?
Hahahaha.
OhI understand you can't help being arrogant because you are Australian, but please make an effort.
I've said before, statistics are blown way out of proportion in cricket. Just because James Anderson's bowling average is about 40, it doesn't mean he is a bad bowler.
Also, it is quite obvious that Rahul Dravid, Sachin Tendulkar and Sourav Ganguly are the Indian equivalents of Inzamam-ul-Haq, Mohammad Yousuf and Younis Khan. King Pietersen is well placed to make that statement.