After the "alleged success" of the 5 bowler theory, I dont see Kohli reverting to 4 bowlers again. We did manage to get 20 wickets in every game.
And despite Pujara's brilliant hundred, Rohit did score in the second innings. Which might just blind the management towards picking him over Pujara
A match winning 145 unbeaten as a make shift opener on a day when none of the other top order batsmen could get past 30, vs a 50 on flat second innings pitch, where even Ashwin score more than Rohit.
How is it even a choice. Honest there would be a riot in India if Rohit starts over Pujara.