anakwalajinn
Club Cricketer
If we had Shoaib Malik, Mushtaq Ahmed, Rana Naveed Ul-Hasan, Shoaib Akhtar & Mohamamd Asif the result would CERTINATLEY been much different! :
anakwalajinn said:If we had Shoaib Malik, Mushtaq Ahmed, Rana Naveed Ul-Hasan, Shoaib Akhtar & Mohamamd Asif the result would CERTINATLEY been much different! :
anakwalajinn said:If we had Shoaib Malik, Mushtaq Ahmed, Rana Naveed Ul-Hasan, Shoaib Akhtar & Mohamamd Asif the result would CERTINATLEY been much different! :
ali_ed2001 said:well we cant make inury excuses, England also have injuries..both teams are even, theyre playing better
evertonfan said:A batsman's paradise. Very bouncy and flat most of the time.
errrr..... Flintoff?anakwalajinn said:I am not making excuses. I am just mentioned it..
England also have injuries but not as big as ours..
And that is a fact!
anakwalajinn said:I am not making excuses. I am just mentioned it..
England also have injuries but not as big as ours..
And that is a fact!
evertonfan said:If we had Michael Vaughan, Simon Jones, Andrew Flintoff and James Anderson things may have been different too.
anakwalajinn said:So you were going to play 5 pacers?
I remember Pakistan used to play 5 seamers in the past! LOL!
Have fun guys, I am going to get some fooood!
andrew_nixon said:errrr..... Flintoff?
anakwalajinn said:If we had Shoaib Malik, Mushtaq Ahmed, Rana Naveed Ul-Hasan, Shoaib Akhtar & Mohamamd Asif the result would CERTINATLEY been much different! :
Sureshot said:Ali, The Oval is not too dissimilar to Old Trafford.
barmyarmy said:Well Mushtaq Ahmed isn't actually injured, he just can't get into the team.
Ironic this morning that Pakistan bowled the best they've done all tour and England end up 121/0.
barmyarmy said:Always good for spin bowlers as well (mainly Saqlain Mushtaq in recent years).