bashar hits back to those that are whining about india and pakistan
http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/wc2007/content/story/289700.html
http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/wc2007/content/story/289700.html
LA ICE-E said:bashar hits back to those that are whining about india and pakistan
http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/wc2007/content/story/289700.html
lol i read that...Bhashar thinks his team is all that quailty n what the hell is he himself? I've never seen him even winning a match for Bangla...he sux n his average suggests that. They're still minnow and need to realize that...just coz they beat SA n India doesn't maek them better side...its coz they were lucky that day and do agree that they have few good youngsters buh Bhashr himself sucks.Sagacious said:After that humiliating defeat against NZL, BD supporters burned his effigy. He just wanted to act smart, nothing else. Who cares?
yeah, that tells me you don't know a lot about the subjects your talking about. Bhashar was the best and most consistent Bangladeshi batsmen before this new patch of youngsters came, his average doesn't do him justice and true that he haven't been performing this world cup. If bangladesh are still "minnows" than may be you should count England and WI minnows too at the moment. Bangladesh isn't the top 8 but they are not the "minnows". Also, luck didn't have anything to do with those wins. They dominated the India game and they won against SA pretty comfortably too. And if you don't pay attention to them; the beat NZ in the warm ups as well. Also one more thing learn how to spell before criticizing others.Justcrazy said:lol i read that...Bhashar thinks his team is all that quailty n what the hell is he himself? I've never seen him even winning a match for Bangla...he sux n his average suggests that. They're still minnow and need to realize that...just coz they beat SA n India doesn't maek them better side...its coz they were lucky that day and do agree that they have few good youngsters buh Bhashr himself sucks.
They didn't lose bad to england...it was close...Lanka right now are performing like they can win the wc while the others weren't.iceman_waugh said:Banlga might have out-played both sides,but they seem to loose it afterwards.
Right after a win,Banlga loses it,they tend to relax.What happened after the win against against India,they got beaten badly by Lanka !
LA ICE-E said:If bangladesh are still "minnows" than may be you should count England and WI minnows too at the moment. Bangladesh isn't the top 8 but they are not the "minnows".
They didn't lose bad to england...it was close...Lanka right now are performing like they can win the wc while the others weren't.
LA ICE-E said:If bangladesh are still "minnows" than may be you should count England and WI minnows too at the moment. Bangladesh isn't the top 8 but they are not the "minnows".
Will_NA said:The reason England aren't minnows are:
a) Regardless of the 5-0 whitewash, they are a very good test team and you can't call a good test team 'minnows' in the ODI form as they have shown the quality of players they have, albeit in a different form of the game
b) If they play to their full capacity, they have the talent to defeat a team comfortably
With Harmison and Hoggard they wouldn't have made it in the Super 8s.iceman_waugh said:I'd say with Harmisson,Tres and Hoggy,they would have made the semis[not ruling out their chances here,but very very bleak].
shery_rsa said:i just said that if india and pakistan are in super 8 that all matches is very crucials
nightprowler10 said:With Harmison and Hoggard they wouldn't have made it in the Super 8s.
What are their averages in ODIs again?iceman_waugh said:You are joking right ?