Vcassano
Club Cricketer
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2006
- Online Cricket Games Owned
I find it laughable people suggesting Broad will have more control than Plunkett. Granted he is a very talented bowler but he has a First Class economy only .11 lower than Plunkett's and Plunkett has played tests. Broad should be given more time to work on his game, with the odd one-dayer or test to give him a gradual introduction to the International arena.
I'm actually becoming more convinced by Sidebottom. Although his inclusion undermines the Performance squad, he should offer good control judging by his first class economy and even his Test economy. He should be good short-term but beyond this series I have my doubts.
Plunkett is a fantastic bowler and should be picked ahead of Mahmood, not because he offers more control but you can see the class he has. Every so often he'll bowl an absolute beauty - his bowled efforts against Gilchrist and Gayle for example. Whether we can afford to have a poor Harmison and him is a different matter though.
I'm actually becoming more convinced by Sidebottom. Although his inclusion undermines the Performance squad, he should offer good control judging by his first class economy and even his Test economy. He should be good short-term but beyond this series I have my doubts.
Plunkett is a fantastic bowler and should be picked ahead of Mahmood, not because he offers more control but you can see the class he has. Every so often he'll bowl an absolute beauty - his bowled efforts against Gilchrist and Gayle for example. Whether we can afford to have a poor Harmison and him is a different matter though.