If we only go with two pace bowlers and drop Harmison so Broad can play, I will launch an all out attack on Peter Moores and Michael Vaughan and Harmison may as well retire.
Mind you, I wouldn't put it past them doing something stupid like that. To me Swann has to play, I'm at the point where I don't even care if it's instead of Panesar.
You don't trust Vaughan and Moores then?
Panesar was poor today of that there's no doubt, but I wouldn't play Swann instead of him. If Hoggy is fit for Galle it makes things interesting if we play two spinners.
Hoggy and Sidebottom? Harmison has done quite well imo, impressed tbh, his body stood up too.
I have no problem in having Hoggard and Sidebottom, I know many on here will have though.
I wouldn't, as I've said I would rather play 5 bowlers but certainly in Sri Lanka the new ball is crucial and its the only time we get wickets so playing 2 top class new ball bowlers would be a smart move.
Mubarak needs to be droped from the Sri Lankan squad. He has 18 runs in 3 inings and he has nothing else to contribute to the team,.
Vaughan seems to have his favourites and strikes me as the kind of bloke who holds a grudge. I.e. do badly once and he remembers it. Meanwhile Moores seems determined to bring in as many good county players as possible and seems determined to keep them in the team to prove his own point. I sense Harmison getting into the squad was more down to the other selectors.
Mubarak is a fantastic fielder, for such a tall fella.
I do agree though, Dilshan is class, my choice to come in after Silva by miles.
i got my wish, Sri Lanka brought Dilshan in instead of Mubarak and fast bowler Chanaka Welegedara. dont know anything about this young bowler but he is replacing Fernando and thats a break for England because Fernando has been geting the crucial wickets in the last 2 tests.
are you talking about the keeper Silva, because i agree with you. he has been playing good for Sri Lanka A.