sohum
Executive member
Glad to see Graham Onions gone from the Test cricketer of the year list!
The Australians are only rowdy when they're winning matches. They've been very well behaved this year.
To be fair though I don't think England deserved to win the ashes, a lot of runs England made were from the tail. I spoke to a pom near where I live and he said the exact same thing.
England shouldn't win spirit of cricket award. Firstly Strauss cheated with that catch, and then you guys go and cheat with the pitch for the final match! If you guys wanted the ashes and glory that much, then you can have it.
thats a joke!!
The Australians are only rowdy when they're winning matches. They've been very well behaved this year.
England shouldn't win spirit of cricket award. Firstly Strauss cheated with that catch, and then you guys go and cheat with the pitch for the final match! If you guys wanted the ashes and glory that much, then you can have it.
Pot calling the Kettle back?
Let's not throw around cheating accusations please. As srikarr said, if we assume Strauss cheated we might as well assume Clarke did against India. Personally I'd prefer to trust that they believed they'd taken the catches.
So before this turns into another fully blown argument, let's use this thread to discuss the great performances of the last year, not throw around accusations.
Doesn't the visiting side typically call? Maybe it had LCD displays and an integrated microphone that converted Ponting's call to text on the fly and displayed what he didn't call on both sides. </geekiness>Sorry guys, as I said before I was letting of a bit of steam. I don't want to become like a Ben or anything. One last word though is that surely, you guys are using a double-sided coin! 9 in a row now:sarcasm
Unfortunately (or rather, thankfully) the cricketer of the year isn't picked only out of the English team.Back on Topic: Strauss should really win the cricketer of the year, he's the only real solid performer for England in their batting this year.