langerrox said:
omfg... you are clueless kid, I don't know how many times it has to be said. GILCHRIST IS THE GREATEST ODI OPENING BATSMAN OF ALL TIME IT HAS BEEN PROVEN BY MANY EX-PLAYERS, ARTICLES AND CRICKET COMMENTATORS!! im not being biased, I dont even like gilchrist...
wow ive answered the question youve re-asked and its been re-answered many times, and i wonder why you argue that tendulkar is better than hayden when wdfu stated his talking TEST MATCHES. god im not even going to bother replying to you.
"Gilchrist is the best opening batsman of all time, because it has been proven by ex-players, articles, and cricket commentators"
WOW! You get a cookie for such a strong and convincing argument...you surely proved me wrong!!!
:
Funny, I have never heard a single ex-player, or read any article, or heard any commentator say that Gilchrist is the greatest opening batsman of all time...So how about you find 1, and im only asking for 1 quote, or an article...thats all I want. God you are pathetic...
Another thing, so if a commentator or an explayer says that Gilchrist is the best, that means he is the best huh? Because they know for sure...
Let me tell you what I know and what the world know's, I'm going to make you eat your words kid...
Time to break out the raw stats! This is going to be fun!
ODI's:
Adam Gilchrist:
Runs: 8233 Highestscore: 172 Average: 36.42 Strikerate: 96.76 100's: 14 50's: 45
very good stats indeed, Gilchrist was a great opener, now let me show you how Tendulkar was that much better....
Sachin Tendulkar:
Runs: 14148 Highestscore: 186 Average: 44.21 Strikerate: 85.97 100's: 39
50's: 72
Ofcourse Gilchrist has not played as many games, but lets see if he had played as many games what his stats would be like, keeping Gilchrist's average of 36.42...
If Tendulkar and Gilchrist would have played the same amount of games, Gilchrist would still be 3000 runs short of tendulkars total tally of ODI runs.
If they played the same amount of games, Gilchrist would 21 hundreds, still a huge 18 hundreds short of Tendulkar. Gilchrist would also have 67 fifties, still short by 5 fifties. And this is if he continued the same way he played many years ago, now I highly doubt it, since Gilchrist's form has started to declined, and rightfully so, he's getting older.
This is not to mention the intense pressure Tendulkar faces each time he comes out to bat, The pressure Gilchrist faces doesn't even come remotely close, not to mention that Gilchrist has never had to face his teams bowling, I'm sure Tendulkar would have feasted on the weak Indian bowling that accompanied him on the team, but even putting all these things aside, and just looking at the facts, Tendulkar wins by a mile.
Another argument that you braught up just got crushed. Buddy you're making yourself look stupid, just quit before I embarrass you further!