Right, as long as the rain doesn't intervene, I think India has a pretty good chance of winning the series 2-0. I wouldn't mind if the rain saves England though, just so we don't have to listen to any moaning about the Lord's test.
Well, actually, if we win, they cant moan about the Lords test either. Because then we effectively win the series 2-0. If they even won at Lords, it would be 2-1. So the counter-argument can be that we would've still won the series.
yes but if we do off for rain then when england fans argue that they should have won at lords, indian fans can aruge that they should have won at the oval....simple![]()
It's better to win rather than argue that we could have won.yes but if we do off for rain then when england fans argue that they should have won at lords, indian fans can aruge that they should have won at the oval....simple![]()
It's better to win rather than argue that we could have won.
If it wasn't for global warming and politics, we would be 2-0 up right now.
Is it me, or have Indian bowlers gotten progressively worse this series in the extras column?
So you are saying that you are arguing against facts? Brilliant!quite prepared to defend my corner against facts...
We wouldn't need that counter-argument because there has really only been one team in this match. If England win this, they deserve it fully. Doesn't look like they are going for it. Probably they'll need a power double from Pietersen to get anywhere near.Well, actually, if we win, they cant moan about the Lords test either. Because then we effectively win the series 2-0. If they even won at Lords, it would be 2-1. So the counter-argument can be that we would've still won the series.
...if it wasn't for the inability to pick the best players in the country, India would have been the top team in the world right now.If it wasn't for global warming and politics, we would be 2-0 up right now.