You never know with England batting.Only Vaughan and KP are dangerous.
Only KP and Vaughan are in good form maybe more precise. All our batsman our dangerous in the effect that they can all bat.
You never know with England batting.Only Vaughan and KP are dangerous.
150 runs per session doesn't seem likely with Kumble bowling on a day 5 pitch.
England can't really afford to have a dart and lose wickets.
Anderson said on interview that England are going to just going to save the match.
Unless saving the game means going at 4.66 RPO then it looks unlikely.
if england need 150 at tea, i can see them having a go at india, especially if kumble's bowling and they are only 4 or less wickets down.....
Keep DreamingThe question is Abbh. If KP is in form, is any type of bowling against him negetive because i know if, and i hope to god it is so, that he will be able to take us at nearly 5 RPO.
I'm surprised that some people are thinking that England can win this match. This is a test match, its not that easy to go at 4.66 per over for 90 overs on a day 5 pitch. India can always resort to negative bowling if they feel threatened.
The question is Abbh. If KP is in form, is any type of bowling against him negetive because i know if, and i hope to god it is so, that he will be able to take us at nearly 5 RPO.
Keep Dreaming. I don't see England winning this match. Indian bowlers are not that crap.
Keep Dreaming. I don't see England winning this match. Indian bowlers are not that crap.
We all know, if Pietersen is on song there is no one who can bowl at him.
He just needs to get himself in a give himself a chance.
Sounds like an easy task for him.![]()
![]()
There's no chance of England chasing it. Unlike ODI cricket there are no field restrictions or requirement to bowl a maximum number of overs per bowler. England should aim to show some backbone, knuckle down and make it through to the close 3 or 4 down.