FB? This is one acronym that I haven't come across earlier.Bucknor is fb. I sat behind his daughter at a test match and my mate got her number \o/
If history is anything to go by, Bucknor is more than generous when he umpires against India.I hope the umpire's are as generous with decisions like this when it's England's turn to bowl. Usually, in close calls like Cook's and Prior's LBWs, the benefit goes to the batsman.
If history is anything to go by, Bucknor is more than generous when he umpires against India.
The bowler and the slips were going nuts too. And the Indian fans might have said "Dhoni did not appeal! He could have got the wicket for India! He is not a true Indian".
You mean 8? And Simon Taufel was temporarily a fool, by your definition.hehehehe
you're funny.
If the ball grassed before Dhoni took it, its not out. He was rightfully called back. Seeing the replays, I don't think anyone, except fools ofcourse, would call it out.
Down 7 now, its a good comeback by India
Surely you mean 250. England need to make 550+, remember?Bell to make 150
Surely you mean 250. England need to make 550+, remember?
I've looked at the replays a few times and going by the commentators' analysis, it seems like it wasn't necessarily that obvious to Dhoni.Yeah, My only problem was that it didnt hit the gloves on his fingers, where you'd expect a catch that low to carry to, it bounced then hit him right by where the hand joins the wrist. So it should have been obvious to him. I'd have had no problem had he just said, look I'm not sure if I've taken it, refer it. But he went up like it was blatant.
Well, obviously I mean about keeping their recent record at Lord's intact. There is no doubting that Sidebottom and Jimmy are going to rip India to pieces.Not really. There is swing and seam.