Why not? Shane Warne did it.
Shane Warne's as much of a tool then clearly. You just don't make public demands to see your coach sacked. The public persona of the team is supposed to be that it's a tight knit unit, that they're all pulling the same way, and all getting along nicely. That may not be the case within the actual camp, but that's the way it should be percieved by the public. As the Cricinfo argument states, with a quote from someone within the ECB, you don't make ultimatum's if you want to keep your job.
As much as I like Kevin Pietersen, I can admit he's completely in the wrong here. You just don't come in and undermine the management, especially so soon after getting the job. There's no doubting that Pietersen has made himself look an utter tool here, but it could work in England's favour. He'll know he's got something to prove now, and it could set him up to have his best year in Test cricket, or it could go the other way and ruin his career. We'll have to wait and see.
And Ben, to pick you up on a comment you made in the other thread relating to this, Pietersen is far from a cricketing genius. No cricketing genius would have allowed the Indian's to win that first test match given the good position England were in, India should never have been able to make 400+ fourth innings. This incident as well proves he's no genius. He's a class batsman, but not a genius.
King Pietersen added 0 Minutes and 55 Seconds later...
Graham Ford is rumoured to be the man in line for the job. Not a bad choice, he's done well for Kent. A Kent bias wouldn't be a bad thing either, means we'll get to see Key and Denly in the side
![Grin :D :D](/forums/styles/planetcricket/xenforo/smilies/biggrin.png)
Just so long as GoJo doesn't get another go I'll be happy.