But why did they want to do that? The Vaughan/Collingwood thing was working, until we became crap in tests and Vaughan resigned. It should have been Strauss as Test captain with Colly staying on as ODI captain.No he shouldn't. ECB wanted to get rid of the split captaincy, so it had to be Pietersen.
cricinfo said:"I question whether there should actually be a head coach. There is already a batting coach, a bowling coach, one for fielding and one for tactics so perhaps what is needed is an overall manager to coordinate the roles. I'd like to see the importance of the head coach downgraded. The ECB will probably look for a stand-in to go on the tour of the Caribbean and make their decision on the permanent successor to Moores after that."
Former England captain and now Times correspondent, Michael Atherton
Lol. All I have got to say.
What else is there to say? It's funny, England cricket always has something going on. They can't stick to a single keeper, they can't stick to a spinner, they STICK to a failing middle order, and they can't stick with a captain either it seems. There's too much crap going on over there tbh, and its funny.