King Pietersen
ICC Board Member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2006
- Location
- Manchester
No, he isn't. You're blinded by your patriotism and love for Anderson.
The only guy in World Cricket that comes close to Anderson in swinging conditions is Steyn, but I'd personally still take Anderson if the conditions match the ones seen throughout the last Test. Steyn swings the ball, but not nearly as much, and doesn't have the control to accurately swing the ball both ways to right and left handers consistently like Anderson. Jimmy's problem is that he's too inconsistent and when it's not swinging can go for runs, but when it's swinging there aren't many better bowlers than James Anderson. I love watching Dale Steyn bowl, and he's far and away the best bowler in the world, but Anderson's the superior swing bowler for me, his ability to swing the ball both ways with very little change in action is so impressive, and he reverses the old ball. Can't ask for much more from a swing bowler really.
^I think he'd be close - with a swinging ball Jimmy is pretty damn good. Who beats him? Steyn probably does. Maybe Zaheer Khan. If Kemar Roach or Mitchell Johnson get it right then they are good too. Aamer isn't consistent enough yet. I really like Asif, but he's more a seamer a la McGrath.
Steyn's the only one that comes close out of those guys. Zaheer's a good swing bowler, but isn't as capable of ripping a batting order apart like Anderson is; Roach and Johnson are primarily seam bowlers and Roach is nowhere near Anderson's level yet. When Johnson gets it right he is devastating, but his wrist position negates the large majority of swing, so he mainly relies on pace and seam movement. Aamer's top class but not proven enough yet to be regarded a better swing bowler than Anderson. Asif again is top class, but he relies more on his accuracy and seam movement than out and out swing.