Paelleon
School Cricketer
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2005
- Online Cricket Games Owned
5-0 is asking a bit much.
But I'm also not into this 'India lost because of bad umpiring, and poor bowling' line of argument. And, sorry - which war did SA and India start? I thought this was a friendly international cricket series.
I find it a great shame that so much aggression has permutated the world of international cricket. Why can we not congratulate each other - rather than be overly critical and attack other teams flaws?
What I take out of the match is:
1. New ball bowling was phenomenal by the SA side. Ntini, in particular, took his role very seriously; and attacked ruthlessly. Pollock was miserly, and created the pressure - it was the most clinical, ruthless and masterful attack I've seen yet.
2. Yuvraj played a masterful reply; with excellent stroke play, and a solid defense with his team five down and looking at both barrels.
3. Smith replied in the best fashion possible - punishing every ball that was marginally bad; and pushing the good ones around.
4. Kallis walked in, with a run rate that looked excellent, and a few quick wickets and partnered Prince superbly; playing only what was needed - and nothing more. Giving few chances, and pushing the singles around at will.
I think this series will go to the wire, every game; and probably overall. That's exciting cricket.
And all without saying: "India are crap! SA rules! We're gonna beat you up! etc etc"
Both teams are good, both can still improve, and both are playing excellent cricket with some superb players on either side. In the words of numerous fictional characters through the years: "Can't we all just get along?"
But I'm also not into this 'India lost because of bad umpiring, and poor bowling' line of argument. And, sorry - which war did SA and India start? I thought this was a friendly international cricket series.
I find it a great shame that so much aggression has permutated the world of international cricket. Why can we not congratulate each other - rather than be overly critical and attack other teams flaws?
What I take out of the match is:
1. New ball bowling was phenomenal by the SA side. Ntini, in particular, took his role very seriously; and attacked ruthlessly. Pollock was miserly, and created the pressure - it was the most clinical, ruthless and masterful attack I've seen yet.
2. Yuvraj played a masterful reply; with excellent stroke play, and a solid defense with his team five down and looking at both barrels.
3. Smith replied in the best fashion possible - punishing every ball that was marginally bad; and pushing the good ones around.
4. Kallis walked in, with a run rate that looked excellent, and a few quick wickets and partnered Prince superbly; playing only what was needed - and nothing more. Giving few chances, and pushing the singles around at will.
I think this series will go to the wire, every game; and probably overall. That's exciting cricket.
And all without saying: "India are crap! SA rules! We're gonna beat you up! etc etc"
Both teams are good, both can still improve, and both are playing excellent cricket with some superb players on either side. In the words of numerous fictional characters through the years: "Can't we all just get along?"