Well that has to be one of the most lop sides boxing days test since the tradition began in 1968
I & i'm sure many other expected australia to topple sri lanka - but not this comfortably especially given the experience int he batting ranks. After all it was only a year ago the sri lanka won a test in south africa.
This Sri Lanka team is not the worst team to tour australia, but they are playing like one of the worst.
Australia v Sri Lanka, 2nd Test, Melbourne, 3rd day : SL Tests offer Australia clues to tackling future challenges | Cricket Features | Australia v Sri Lanka | ESPN Cricinfo
As that cricinfo article rightfully mentions as i reasoned after the south africa series, such a easy series vs sri lanka & a what should be a less the threatening sub-continent india series challenge really is not going to tell australia much going into the ashes double headers sadly.
But the selectors could make the india series difficult if they coeup with dumb selection. Why in god's name is john inverarity trying to outdow andrew hilditch type crap selections. What is Maxwell doing in the test team & why is clarke talking him up as a potential 2nd spinner options for the inida tour???
*sighs*
Talk about over-complicating selections. AUS dont have spinners of the standard of swann & monty. In case they forget england win was the first time that two-spinners combined to beat india @ home since they became a force @ home in the 1970s - other than iqbal qasim/tauseef ahemd in 1987.
Otherwise pace wins in india - which australia have in abundance. India's batting is in decline, no dravid,, laxman, etc around - more reasons why aus main wicket-taking options in should be this simple option.
On Shane Watson - fact is he is an all-rounder. If it is his body fails to stand up to the role like flintoff & cairns then so be it - but its suits australia best if he plays as an all-rounder.