Ok guys. I genuinely apologize for my inactivity. I know how frustrating it is to have inactive member as I have been on the other end too. In my defense, I had said to Jack about this before joining. I was offline from PC. It's not like I was online and I chose not to post in this thread. Still, it's no good and I should have contributed more to this game.
Coming to game, I honestly went through all the posts. (It's almost 2am here and Saturday) I want to reread all the posts on a clear mind before actually start posting. But, since it's already too late (since posting) and I want to contribute, I have picked out 2 things (others have pointed too) but I haven't been able to quite grasp it..
1- The way Mrs Pacman lynched cremer. I didn't find any valid reason on why she did that. At that point, Cremer was under few people's radar. Was she just cashing on it hoping others would join? Note that I am not defending cremer. I am just wondering why she chose him to lynch as I did not find any reasons other than 'consensus candidate'.
2- About Fake's claiming. He claimed that all town need to be alive and mafias need to die in order for him to win or something in that grounds. I also want town to win, but how can the town win without losing their teammate ? This is a huge setup and town cannot win without losing one of its own (as harsh as it sounds, it's true). So, I don't think Jack will give anything like that to anyone. What I am feeling is, he is role claiming a role which he is sure no one will get so that he can be safe. I just don't buy this claim. So,
FOS: Fake.
I am not going to lynch before getting a reply.
And, I read few arguments between loco, varun, cremer, surendar and tbh, it's all blurry to me. I need to reread about those things again to post something on those topics which I cannot do today unfortunately.