In New Zealand, the idea was to rest McGrath and test out some alternative players. When the series was won, Lee too was sent home (well, they said it was some kind of illness, but whatever). This left the team with Nathan Bracken essentially to carry the attack built of Clark, Lewis, Johnson, White and Symonds. White and Symonds were hardly going to provide impressive change-of-pace options and Lewis, Johnson and Clark between them still have less than 10 matches of ODI experience. Even if the selectors were to find a magical superpower out of the 3 untested pacemen, it was still an enormous risk and all we really learnt from the experiment is that an underpowered attack on a small ground gets smacked.
The way I see it, if you lose your best tall right arm medium-fast bowler, you can't simply replace him with some other tall right arm medium-fast bowler and hope to get away with it. Don't replace him with a player of the same type, unless they have the quality. The summer has seen four new pacemen get a run, but extraordinarily Cameron White is the only new face in the spin department.
angryangry said:
(**Sorry messed up the quote, ends here**)
Good point but I still believe, when given the opportunity, Stuart Clark has bowled quite well, with consistent accuracy, decent pace and occassional movement. Despite lack of 'international' experience, he does know how to handle plenty of situations based on his good domestic record. About the attack against New Zealand, yes he may struggle without leadership as most players would at that level, but when he gets support from the other end he, I think, has atleast stood out above bowlers like Lewis, Dorey and Johnson.
About Cameron White, I think he should be persisted with his batting, he's very good there, and a mature captain to be able to handle it from so young. But I don't know if he's the long term spinning option, unless he improves out of sight, Dan Cullen may be preferred or another newcomer.