Trans-Tasman Trophy (NZ in Australia), December 2011/12

Although i agree with the idea in premise that Howard is trying to perpetuate across the board for AUS quick bowlers, it makes no sense with Harris.

The man is AUS version of Bond, Flintoff, Akhtar with regards to his knee injury. Once he is fit he has to play and that's how AUS have to deal with him, until he himself feels he cant handle tests anymore.

Given he is 32 and doesn't have long more, i dont see the logic behind trying to make him perfect unless they can find him a new knee - which obviously wont happen.

He is the spearhead and the risk was already taken to make him the attack leader for tests given the lack of options post 2010 Ashes, when realistically most already knew his body couldn't take him.

Harris's body can only last T20s and ODIs properly, but AUS still need him to lead the attack and I seriously hope Howard's decision is revisited and Harris is playing the 1st test against India.

I really didn't understand what Howard was talking about:
We know we could rush him back quickly and get him bowling for two or three days
How?? Is my question. How does one look at Harris and say, oh he could only last 2 or 3 days? They must have some mighty precise medical tools these days to know that. I'm with you though mate, if they think he can get through a Test match he needs to play. Talking about being 100% if fair enough for the kids, but for the best bowler, he needs to play whenever he's able to string a few spells together.

Managed to catch some highlights earlier today. Pattison looks a real find - has the build and skills to become a great for Australia.

Starc, on the other hand, seems like to be Johnson 2.0 - too many wayward deliveries to pose a consistent threat. Early days, though.

Yah agree. Pattinson was a bit loose (and a bit unlucky) on the first morning, but seemed to tighten up since then. Starc seems just loose all the time, he'll be better in a couple of years. I think he'd get savaged vs India.
 
Just get on a plane and crash into the middle of the Pacific, seriously wtf...
 
I disagree about the no balls. Like he bowled nine no balls in the tour match, which was one every two overs. He's only bowling low 130s so there's no reason why he should be overstepping the line so much. Why is he overstepping the line so much while Martin isn't? This is the stuff they should have looked at after the tour match, because it ended up costing us over 100 runs, but instead I assume they were all off playing golf and drinking, celebrating a draw with Australia A.

Southee was ????. He didn't get the ball to do anything with the old ball, and was relegated to first change with the new ball behind Martin and Bracewell. He just wasn't putting the ball in the right areas, for some reason he seemed to be really struggling.

The main reason I can assume he has this no ball problem is because his delivery stride is so large (I'm kind of similar) so you end up stretching too far, whereas guys like Southee and Martin run through the crease more (Martin's jump makes his stride smaller). But like you say he really could've been working on it in between the tour game and the test, but most likely no one really cared because they thought we'd be sweet after how we did in the tour game. I think you are spot on about the drinking and playing golf instead, some of the things I'm hearing about the team culture it wouldn't surprise me.
 
What a fried chickenen joke. This guys on fried chickenen debut and they're making him look like McGrath.

Taylor you're a joke. Two terrible batting options and a dropped catch, I used to respect you.
 
Ok what is going on? I didn't even realise the day has started yet and then I check cricinfo....

----------

Pattinson lock him in for the future.

Its a good start for him, but we suck :p Should be interesting to see how he goes against India though.
 
Is this squad for the whole series, or can we get a new team in for the second test?
 
Ok this really is not good enough, I don't care if thats how you play at 20-4 you don't play a shot like that.

----------

Is this squad for the whole series, or can we get a new team in for the second test?

How about Ingram and McIntosh to open?? :p
 
It's good to see Australia giving some young guys a chance, even if it is mainly due to injuries. Their team from the last few years has just looked flat and devoid of ideas whenever I've watched them play.
 
How about Ingram and McIntosh to open?? :p

I'd go with:

1. T McIntosh
2. J Raval
3. H Marshall
4. D Brownlie
5. D Vettori
6. C de Grandhomme
7. K van Wyk
8. A Adams
9. D Bracewell
10. T Nethula
11. C Martin

Maybe only a slight Auckland bias. :p
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top