2014 World Cup Group D: Uruguay, Costa Rica, England, Italy

Note to self:

When pissed please refrain from talking absolute crap on PC

Ste is actually 100% right? Italy needed a draw against Uruguay regardless of a 1-1 draw or a 1-0 loss against Costa Rica. On the contrary, conceding a second against Costa Rica would have meant they needed a win against Uruguay. So yes, not conceding a second was far more crucial for the Italians than getting an equaliser, as the equation wouldn't have changed whatsoever in case of the latter.
 
Sort of expecting a nasty game with Italy & Uruguay. Won't be surprised if i see a plethora of yellow cards and red. But I hope i'm wrong.
 
Yep I knew this would happen, ugly Uruguay vs super catennaacio italy was almost going cause this sort of game.

Suarez SMFH :facepalm
 
In terms of football it was a terrible game.

Top class snidey-ness all round from both teams, though. Quite entertaining.
 
Bq6Qa0VCMAAjF9d.jpg
 
1 point :D England the worst team in this WC !!
 
Suarez needs to be banned from the rest of the World Cup at the very, very least. There's a huge difference between the bad, rash tackles that you see and intentionally assaulting a player during the game. In Rugby players have been mutilated because of biting; so anyone during it in Football should be punished harshly.

e:
And why is that funny to you?

The funny thing is that the "anti-English" Scots haven't said anything about England since the Uruguay game and are just enjoying the world cup for what it is. I have much, much more respect of England fans than I do of people who treat international football like club football and seem to end up cheering for Italy, Germany and Brazil at the same time... Hey; I genuinely wish that they had beaten Uruguay now!!
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top