War
Chairman of Selectors
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2010
- Online Cricket Games Owned
1st test review
I don't like commenting on a test match while its in progress, so i didn't follow the discussion during the last 5 days, so forgive me all if i repeat anything that has been said before.
But immediately i can say AUS can take heart from the fact that they are many similarities to this 1st test defeat to how England lost their first test in December before they eventually came back to win the series.
Just like how Cook's 176 & Prior's 91 showed the other ENG batsman how the play play in that Ahmedabad test - so too in this test did Clarke 130 & Henriques two classy innings.
I still don't believe India's spinners are that great in home conditions & one good effort from Ashwin doesn't change that.
Much positives can also be taken from the fact that in India's 1st innings their bowling plans were going well up to when India were 372/7 - until Dhoni played the kind of unique world-wind innings similar to Gilchrist 204 @ Jo'Burg 2002, Astle's 222 in 2002, Chanderpaul's 100 in 2003, Viv Richards fastest test hundred in 1986, Gilbert Jessop 104 in 1902. Not much a bowling team can do in such a situation frankly.
However they are few differences from England that i'm not sure if AUS are going to be able to replicate.
Batting wise ENG were much more experienced, stronger & stable. This enabled to to be able to get on top of India's spinners as they series progressed. I feel as the series progresses not picking Bailey is going to come back to haunt Australia. I still firmly believe Watson should be opening & that Cowan should be sacrificed.
Also while Wade can bat in the top 6, i'm not 100% sure if he is solid enough to be a top 6 batsman in Indian conditions. I saw it mentioned in the thread & maybe yea i reckon Haddin would have been a better top 6 keeper/batsman in these conditions.
Finally, Siddle & Starc need to step big in the next 3 tests. Pattinson was a one man show. They were noticeably below the standards they set in AUS were the were bowling superbly on some flat last day surfaces, producing top reverse swing.
The 3 of them bowling in top form can take 20 wickets in these conditions, since Lyon is no Graeme Swann & he has much limitations that were not surprisingly exposed in the test.
Australia in India 2012-13 : Jackson Bird flies home with back pain | Cricket News | India v Australia | ESPN Cricinfo. If Bird is ruled out Cutting or Faulkner i would suggest on current form over older bowlers like Hilfenahaus or Bollinger would be good replacements.
Finally to the Indian fans, how long now has the Chennai ground been renovated now?. I realize test weren't played there since 2008 - but i didn't notice this big chance in the few IPL games i have seen in the last 5 years.
I know the gaps between the stands would probably help the players, because the old Chennai could certainly could be a furnace. However i think some uniqueness of this classic old venue has been killed with these changes.
I don't like commenting on a test match while its in progress, so i didn't follow the discussion during the last 5 days, so forgive me all if i repeat anything that has been said before.
But immediately i can say AUS can take heart from the fact that they are many similarities to this 1st test defeat to how England lost their first test in December before they eventually came back to win the series.
Just like how Cook's 176 & Prior's 91 showed the other ENG batsman how the play play in that Ahmedabad test - so too in this test did Clarke 130 & Henriques two classy innings.
I still don't believe India's spinners are that great in home conditions & one good effort from Ashwin doesn't change that.
Much positives can also be taken from the fact that in India's 1st innings their bowling plans were going well up to when India were 372/7 - until Dhoni played the kind of unique world-wind innings similar to Gilchrist 204 @ Jo'Burg 2002, Astle's 222 in 2002, Chanderpaul's 100 in 2003, Viv Richards fastest test hundred in 1986, Gilbert Jessop 104 in 1902. Not much a bowling team can do in such a situation frankly.
However they are few differences from England that i'm not sure if AUS are going to be able to replicate.
Batting wise ENG were much more experienced, stronger & stable. This enabled to to be able to get on top of India's spinners as they series progressed. I feel as the series progresses not picking Bailey is going to come back to haunt Australia. I still firmly believe Watson should be opening & that Cowan should be sacrificed.
Also while Wade can bat in the top 6, i'm not 100% sure if he is solid enough to be a top 6 batsman in Indian conditions. I saw it mentioned in the thread & maybe yea i reckon Haddin would have been a better top 6 keeper/batsman in these conditions.
Finally, Siddle & Starc need to step big in the next 3 tests. Pattinson was a one man show. They were noticeably below the standards they set in AUS were the were bowling superbly on some flat last day surfaces, producing top reverse swing.
The 3 of them bowling in top form can take 20 wickets in these conditions, since Lyon is no Graeme Swann & he has much limitations that were not surprisingly exposed in the test.
Australia in India 2012-13 : Jackson Bird flies home with back pain | Cricket News | India v Australia | ESPN Cricinfo. If Bird is ruled out Cutting or Faulkner i would suggest on current form over older bowlers like Hilfenahaus or Bollinger would be good replacements.
Finally to the Indian fans, how long now has the Chennai ground been renovated now?. I realize test weren't played there since 2008 - but i didn't notice this big chance in the few IPL games i have seen in the last 5 years.
I know the gaps between the stands would probably help the players, because the old Chennai could certainly could be a furnace. However i think some uniqueness of this classic old venue has been killed with these changes.
Last edited: