bowled SA for under 200.
Some dreams never happen.
bowled SA for under 200.
Not only India, every home team does. That is why they are called HOME TEAMS. They have control over the conditions of the pitch.
Today's washout means that SA now are heading towards safety. If they bat two sessions or so, India won't have enough time to chase anything down. Even if they attempt to do so in the limited time available, that plays into SA's hands. I can only see one reault from here on.
[DOUBLEPOST=1515337589][/DOUBLEPOST]Yet no team have manipulated home conditions as India have done.[DOUBLEPOST=1515328444][/DOUBLEPOST]
What? So Eng doesn't manipulate their home conditions? Eng does it the most, they prepare pitches that are damp with a lot of moisture which results in test matches ending inside 3 days. It has happened during the Ashes, against SA, against India and any other subcontinent teams. So England can get away with that? And lets not forget that the weather in India is always usually hot, hotter than in other cricket playing nation. The groundsman can only do so much before the sun pretty much breaks the pitch down and the ball starts turning.
Today's washout means that SA now are heading towards safety. If they bat two sessions or so, India won't have enough time to chase anything down. Even if they attempt to do so in the limited time available, that plays into SA's hands. I can only see one reault from here on.
It is appalling as to how frequently we have mopping equipment malfunction in cricket. Outside of England, Australia and SL, so much time is lost so often in malfunctiining supersoppers and bad drainage. For an iconic stadium like Newlands to not be ready for a situation like today is sad for test cricket which struggles for attention otherwise. For once, we have an intriguing contest and what we have are supersoppers which aren't functioning properly.[DOUBLEPOST=1515329342][/DOUBLEPOST]To lose a whole day's play to a drizzle is shameful.
[DOUBLEPOST=1515337589][/DOUBLEPOST]
Do you think it could still be a tight finish?
So you basically admitted and agreed that India indeed manipulate pitches for home matches. Great. Lets move on.
I still think Kohli is overall a better batsman than Smith/Root, that being said for all three guys have not been tested too much by quality fast bowling.
Smith and Kohli have both struggled in England when the ball was swinging.
Root failed in Aus against Starc and co and now we wait to see Kohli’s failure, flr what its worth I hope he bats well in the remainder of the series.
Agreed. But most of the frustration is due to the fact that we have much better resources available at disposal and we chose the personnel least equipped to make an impact here. Rahul in place of Dhawan, Rahane for Rohit and Umesh/Ishant for Bumrah would make it a much mote solid test lineup. Also, the reason we are so downright dejected is because the guys playing in the XI are proven test failures overseas while those siting outside have a good record against high quality pace in testing situations. Rohit or Dhawan have never played anything close to Rahane or Rahul's efforts I will list below:
Rahane's hundreds at Wellington (2014), MCG, Lords and a near hundred at Durban came against the likes of Anderson, Broad, Boult, Starc, Johnson, Steyn and co. Even if you look at who stood out in tough situations at home or even in the tours to SL and WI, it was either him or Pujara in most cases. Those twin hundreds on a really tough wicket at Delhi, a really fighting second innings hundred at Colombo on a green track coming in with early wickets down. A couple of other hundreds in the Caribbean when others had fallen as well as a few really crucial knocks under immense pressure against Australia at home earlier this year. Its essentially that home series against SL where he failed and most of them were with the side trying to set up a declaration. Sharma might look a million dollars when there is no context to the game (exactly the situation in the SL series) and that is all there is to him.
Now coming to Rahul. The man scores 80s and 90s against an Aussie attack consisting of Hazelwood, Starc, Cummins and Lyon on some treacherous tracks which aided both seam and spin at home and also has hundreds on spicy tracks in the WI and SL to go with his maiden hundred at the SCG. He geta replaced after a streak of 8 consecutive 50s by a flat track bully in Dhawan who is a proven liability. We fans are not just speculating, its a really educated, logical point that makes Rahane and Rahul's inclusions a no-brainer.
Let me not even get started with Bumrah's inclusion. Yadav bowled some exceptional spells on dead tracks at home and had close to a dozen catches put down by our slip cordon. He got the most crucial breakthroughs at vital times against England and also cut through the Aussie batting a few months ago. Yet, a defensive back of length T20 bowler in Bumrah becomes our management's first choice.
We have the resources to run SA close in SA but if we keep selecting based on our captain's friendships, we will get whitewashed. Had these three played, at least one of them would have come good and we would have a much closer test right now. Knowing our captain and how big an ego maniac he and our coach arez I don't expect a course correction in thr next test either.
When you say the manipulated the pitch conditions, every home team does that. That's called an advantage for the home team so don't make it sound like Indian is the only one that does it and you didn't really need to say "manipulated the pitch conditions", they've got every right to do so when they're the home team.
Smith and Kohli have both struggled in England when the ball was swinging.
I think he's going to fail the whole series. Just too much nonsense aggression crap. No ability to perform when needed the most.[/QUOTE
https://www.google.com/amp/s/arynews.tv/en/pune-india-pitch-sting-operation/amp/
Just to refresh your memory on the level if manipulation taking place in India